I think it was The Last Refuge/Conservative Treehouse who wrote an article about how the financials of Twitter don’t make any sense. He described Twitter as a real-time updated site for all users concurrently, which is insanely demanding for database and processing infrastructure whose cost would be far more than twitters revenue could s…
I think it was The Last Refuge/Conservative Treehouse who wrote an article about how the financials of Twitter don’t make any sense. He described Twitter as a real-time updated site for all users concurrently, which is insanely demanding for database and processing infrastructure whose cost would be far more than twitters revenue could support. He proposed there’s only one entity out there that could be the infrastructure sugar daddy for Twitter, and we all know who that is.
And the same goes for Tesla via ZEV credits and other taxpayer theft monies. Minus ZEV carbon credits there has never been a profitable quarter for Tesla.
Which is why these are all CIA assets as per the article.
I think it was The Last Refuge/Conservative Treehouse who wrote an article about how the financials of Twitter don’t make any sense. He described Twitter as a real-time updated site for all users concurrently, which is insanely demanding for database and processing infrastructure whose cost would be far more than twitters revenue could support. He proposed there’s only one entity out there that could be the infrastructure sugar daddy for Twitter, and we all know who that is.
And the same goes for Tesla via ZEV credits and other taxpayer theft monies. Minus ZEV carbon credits there has never been a profitable quarter for Tesla.
Which is why these are all CIA assets as per the article.