29 Comments
User's avatar
Beth Burton's avatar

Yes! but we cannot trust the General Practitioner either because they have driven out the older doctor population that had some common sense and are brainwashing the younger GPs. My husband’s GP pushes a statin and jabs (flu) every time he sees him! And they get pissed when you disregard their advice. Disgusting 🤮

Expand full comment
Mick From Hooe (UK)'s avatar

I've confronted my local GP with questions like why do you fail to obtain proper 'informed consent' and why do you fail to honour your pledge "first do no harm".

His response says it all = "it's a mess, isn't it?" and "What can we do about it"?

This tells me he knows exactly what's been going on, but is prepared to collaborate with the evil and corrupt Big Pharma, who put profit before HUMAN HEALTH.

Unjabbed Mick (UK).

Expand full comment
Stephen Dedalus's avatar

Well, you know, there’s the mortgage that has to be paid and the wife wants a new BMW and the kids are ready to start private college….

Expand full comment
Dee Dee's avatar

exactly, they know but refuse to say anything against and participate

Expand full comment
djean111's avatar

In yet another reason not to trust - now that the government will stop paying doctors to give jabs, the doctors will probably stop recommending jabs. "Health care" is just another business.

Expand full comment
Beth Burton's avatar

Yes! @djean111

Expand full comment
Occam's avatar

100%

Visit my doctor and walk away with a prescription. That's about all they do.

Expand full comment
Occam's avatar

100%

Visit my doctor and walk away with a prescription. That's about all they do.

Expand full comment
Stan's avatar

Correct. The constitution does not authorize the government to be involved in any of the activities that are currently doing in healthcare, welfare, housing, food, and wealth transfer in general. Until and unless we return the federal government to its strict restraints under the constitution were finished.

Expand full comment
Dee's avatar

I don't think we can vote our way out of the horrifically corrupt system we currently have. Even our court system is corrupt.

Expand full comment
Stan's avatar

You’re right, we can’t. Way too late for that. Spicy times are on the way. And soon.

Expand full comment
Stephen Dedalus's avatar

However, the Federal Justice Department IS charged with upholding the Constitution against all enemies, foreign and domestic, and “domestic” includes the states that are actually the perpetrators of the mandates while hiding behind unconstitutional federal decoy laws such as 1986 and PREP**. So let’s go over an abbreviated list of Constitutional violations by the states when they coerce or force medical mandates, including vaccine mandates: 1) Mandates are animated by the evil ethical theories of altruism and utilitarianism; but these theories of morality are effectively religious doctrines, so the states are violating the establishment clause of the first amendment when they enforce policies based upon religious doctrines. 2)When the states demand tests of religious sincerity or even outright deny religious exemption, they are violating the “free exercise” clause of the first amendment. 3) When the states interfere with civil lawsuits between two private parties (even if they use 1986 and PREP as excuses ) they violate the seventh amendment that guarantees the right to a jury trial for controversies in common law greater than $20. 4)When the states force or coerce medical interventions on legal adults and those for whom legal adults have lawful custody (children) then the states are, in effect, treating free citizens as indentured servants in violation of the 13th amendment. 5)When the states force or coerce medical interventions, they violate the 14th amendment that prohibits a State from depriving “any person of life, LIBERTY, or property, without due process of law; nor deny[ing] to any person within its jurisdiction the equal protection of the laws.” This is just an abbreviated list, but it’s more than sufficient for the Justice Department to bring legal action against the States.

….

**Not only does the Constitution NOT give Congress explicit authority to enforce vaccinations or provide legal immunity (as the author astutely argues), but Article III neither gives the Supreme Court or its inferior courts the authority to adjudicate disputes between two private parties. Hence, 1986 and PREP are legal decoys meant to distract the opposition away from the real targets, the states. This allows both federal and state bureaucracies to avoid responsibility by hiding behind “separation of powers” or federalism.

Expand full comment
Stan's avatar

Absolutely correct!

Expand full comment
LINCOLN LOVER's avatar

The entire vaccine fraud should be the thing exposed but I imagine they think it too much for people to handle, to know what they have been exposed to. I know many people who believe vaccine science would have a meltdown or not believe a word of it! We have been long ago taken over by the world gov't beast and until such time as those people who have learned history will expose the truth, we will be under constant threat and tyranny. Does anyone even want to know the truth? History tells the story and the bible confirms it all.

Expand full comment
Steven Bradford's avatar

With the way the US government works, where everyone in power is bought by some corporation or special interest or political benefactors with an agenda, and clear conflicts of interest are not investigated or prosecuted, it must have been a huge struggle just to reduce the vaccine schedule from 70 to ~30 and change that food pyramid. As long as there are no illegal mandates and these vaccines remain “recommendations”, the ultimate decision remains with the individual, who can refuse them all, and that is an improvement from where it was just a few years ago.

Expand full comment
Dee's avatar

As we talk about the corrupt medical mafia system that we have, and the recently discovered corrupt day care, we forgot the TRILLIONS, I mean TRILLIONS, not billions, but TRILLIONS, that went missing around the time of 9/11 and relatively recently again. It just evaporated into thin air. Much like American Malls and all the jobs we used to have. Just gone. No explanation. Just forget about it. Move along now.

Expand full comment
Steve Brown's avatar

Government needs to get out of education. Our doctors have been trained and continue to be trained by the same organized crime and eugenics groups that want to control and kill us. The exam room will not change until we are properly educated in real medicine.

Expand full comment
Mick From Hooe (UK)'s avatar

We now regard being regarded as 'Anti-Vax' is a badge of honor and a signal that, since Covid and the DEADLY injections, (which they pretend are 'Vaccines') is corruption. We've learned to distrust the medical and pharmaceutical professions. 'Anti-Vax' proves a degree of intellect and an inquisitive mind.

Bearing in mind these murdering criminals Pfizer, Moderna, J&J, Merck, etc, still use the PREP Act Shield to avoid Financial and moral LIABILITY for physical injuries and deaths caused by their dangerous, sometimes LETHAL, 'Medicines'! Bobby Kennedy - Stop the insane PREP Act - NOW!

A printed fact I read today; "Pfizer has had to pay out between $3.3 and $3.6 BILLION dollars US for outright fraud and other serious crimes as a result of drug misconduct .........."

But still, they still have the 'PREP Act Shield' to avoid financial and moral LIABILITY for physical injuries and deaths caused by their dangerous, and LETHAL, 'Medicines'!

It seems highly profitable DEPOPULATION is the name of the game!

Unjabbed Mick (UK Patriot).

Expand full comment
Darius's avatar

Mary is a real hero!

Expand full comment
Aaron's avatar

The problem is the government was and is paying doctors bonuses to give these jabs. That needs to stop now. Save the children!!

Expand full comment
Donna C's avatar

My doctor never pushed the Covid jabs on me. She’s a keeper.

Expand full comment
Dee Dee's avatar

Pic of Bourla has a strange similarity to Eichmann...the banality of evil. Thank-you Hannah Ardent.

Expand full comment
Tom Childs's avatar

Yes, MAHA advances are painfully and glacially slow. I asked CHAT GPT whether the HHS director can unilaterally pull the mRNA vaccines off the market. The answer was sobering to realize the steps needed and the myriad HHS scientists required to cohesively agree to do so before the director can authorize pulling the vaccines off the market.

It would be the equivalent of one man trying to overturn an Abrams tank.

Expand full comment
John Roberts's avatar

We need more Dr. Marry Talley Bowden’s !!!

Expand full comment
Aliss Terpstra's avatar

That is a very brave choice for a licensed medical doctor to make. It's easier for us plebes who don't have a career on the line. I wish Dr. Bowden every success in continuing to practice ethical, practical, logical medicine, using her own level head and highly sensitive b.s. detector.

Expand full comment
Occam's avatar

Objectively speaking, a national authority on vaccines, health matters and recommendations for the the optimum health of Americans is a great idea. Saves a ton of work, and can shape policy for Americans across the board.

That's not the issue.

The issue is that we had that regulatory body and is was completely captured and corrupted by corporate interests.

And that is SHAMEFUL.

Expand full comment