Then who WILL you vote for? And if your candidate doesn't get the nomination, you would rather not vote and let your non-vote be a vote for the bigger evil?
Then who WILL you vote for? And if your candidate doesn't get the nomination, you would rather not vote and let your non-vote be a vote for the bigger evil?
No, but voting for a candidate that I like, even if that candidate can't win, helps me sleep better at night than I did when I voted for McCain or Romney.
Yeah, but that's like voting for Ross Perot. I wanted to vote for him, but in the end, he likely stole votes from Bush, who I don't like, but is so much better than 8 years of Clinton.
Then who WILL you vote for? And if your candidate doesn't get the nomination, you would rather not vote and let your non-vote be a vote for the bigger evil?
That's a fallacy. A non-vote is not a vote for the bigger evil.
For all practical purposes, what is it then?
It's just not a vote for either candidate.
No, but voting for a candidate that I like, even if that candidate can't win, helps me sleep better at night than I did when I voted for McCain or Romney.
Yeah, but that's like voting for Ross Perot. I wanted to vote for him, but in the end, he likely stole votes from Bush, who I don't like, but is so much better than 8 years of Clinton.
Bingo!