Hey 2ndSG, yes, this had the potential to go completely tits up - if the poor baby died with vaxxed blood, that would not have been a good look, the stance of the government only had bad PR written all over it. There was only risk and no benefit to them. Where have we heard that before?
I must say, part of me was thinking that if the baby died from the poison blood, then this baby would have been one of the most powerful forces in exposing these bioterror crimes against humanity; in other words, the baby would not have died in vain.
But they could still use the poison DEATHVAX blood for other psyop reasons.
The point is, no WEF gov is to be trusted, nor are any hospitals.
Hey mate, I totally hear what you are saying. It's beyond dystopian.
Unfortunately, the fight we face next year is going to be off the charts. They are going to push the WHO Pandemic treaty. I see converging timelines around April/May next year if they pass it, probably a new "virus" that will allow the WHO to flex their new muscles (of course, on this occasion there doesn't even need to be a virus, if the WHO says something bad is happening, it's happening).
I'm trying to get people on Substack to stop looking back into the past and focus on the next fight. If we lose what is coming we are basically toast as far as I can see.
I've given up on trying to predict timelines. I'm pretty accurate on the happenings themselves but yeah, things can take way longer than you expect. With that said my "converging timelines" are the EU "travel passport" renewal, the extension of the US "Covid state of Emergency" and when the Pandemic treaty is expected to be ratified.
I'll buy a Psyop 23 t-shirt in Zelensky green off you. 😂
I'm sure we will win but when and where I don't know. As Karl Denninger says, no command and control system can last forever. That's great but the Soviet Union lasted for 75 years.
This was my first thought. But on further consideration, I concluded that if the poor baby didn't make it, they would likely just shift the blame to something else. One obvious ploy would be to blame the parents for "waiting too long".
No surgeon wants to lose a patient. The surgeon would have demanded the untainted blood products or no operation. The surgeon has all the power in such situations. If the surgeon wanted a particular blood product and it was available, she would have got it. And of course untainted blood was available and no governnent, court or judge can stand in the way of that demand. It's really kind of simple if you understand the responsibility that the surgeon has. Of course the government is going to try to spin another story because they don't really want patients to know how much power the surgeon has in cases like this.
In a way, this gets to the core of the issue, which has two main points. 1) The request was not difficult or time-consuming to fulfill, and hence would not delay the surgery. 2) Even if those insisting that ALL blood products are safe are correct, fulfilling this request has no downside from a medical perspective--and no one has said that it does. This is the big "tell"--it shows you that this government overreach was driven purely by politics rather than science and medicine.
It was the surgeon's demand. Nobody can overide her demands. Not the government, the courts or a judge. Don't give any credit to the conscience of the beaurocracy. There is none. Credit to the surgeon who went up against a massive force. But she knew the power she had at the operating table where she is "god" for the duration of the surgery. It seems everyone misread as to where the power lay in this decision as to what blood product would be used for this surgery. Now everyone who is about to have surgery should be having a serious discussion with their surgeon.
The international conversation better occur soon before bad blood circulates even more among recipients. Maybe McCullough and Cole and a few of their hacks could compare research and clinical judgments.
Just guessing. If this was a Māori family they would have honored the parents demands.
So let's put it right out there. When a life, ONE life, is on the line. When everything that actually matters matters. The despicable government chose PUREBLOOD. God willing, Baby Will survives. And if its true, that he actually received un-mRNA-injected blood then his parents are heroes.
Why go through all the drama and heartache for the parents, then just to turn around to acquiesce? This implies that the State knows vaxxed blood is dangerous OR it is weighing the risk of surgery with vaxxed blood, where if the baby dies (whether the blood is to blame or not) then all hell will break loose.
Feels like right now the narrative of the goodies is getting more traction than the baddies. Then again, I could be the sucker and they are masterminding the whole show. If Bobby Malone is suddenly moved to head of a "new , transparent and effective" WHO or CDC, that'll be my sign it's all a Truman Show.
I wanna see RFK there instead. Malone has a multimillion dollar lawsuit against folks for disrespecting his addition of "psychosis" to the end of "mass formation."
Usually I say hell exists. But I must add, lower rungs of hell exist.
Those filthy bastards.
Hey 2ndSG, yes, this had the potential to go completely tits up - if the poor baby died with vaxxed blood, that would not have been a good look, the stance of the government only had bad PR written all over it. There was only risk and no benefit to them. Where have we heard that before?
I must say, part of me was thinking that if the baby died from the poison blood, then this baby would have been one of the most powerful forces in exposing these bioterror crimes against humanity; in other words, the baby would not have died in vain.
But they could still use the poison DEATHVAX blood for other psyop reasons.
The point is, no WEF gov is to be trusted, nor are any hospitals.
Dystopian times...
Hey mate, I totally hear what you are saying. It's beyond dystopian.
Unfortunately, the fight we face next year is going to be off the charts. They are going to push the WHO Pandemic treaty. I see converging timelines around April/May next year if they pass it, probably a new "virus" that will allow the WHO to flex their new muscles (of course, on this occasion there doesn't even need to be a virus, if the WHO says something bad is happening, it's happening).
I'm trying to get people on Substack to stop looking back into the past and focus on the next fight. If we lose what is coming we are basically toast as far as I can see.
We will 100% win, but there will be mass casualties and much pain.
I may have been off a few months with my PSYOP-22, and it may just very well end up being PSYOP-23 which has a catchier cult cypher ring to it.
I've given up on trying to predict timelines. I'm pretty accurate on the happenings themselves but yeah, things can take way longer than you expect. With that said my "converging timelines" are the EU "travel passport" renewal, the extension of the US "Covid state of Emergency" and when the Pandemic treaty is expected to be ratified.
I'll buy a Psyop 23 t-shirt in Zelensky green off you. 😂
I'm sure we will win but when and where I don't know. As Karl Denninger says, no command and control system can last forever. That's great but the Soviet Union lasted for 75 years.
This was my first thought. But on further consideration, I concluded that if the poor baby didn't make it, they would likely just shift the blame to something else. One obvious ploy would be to blame the parents for "waiting too long".
No surgeon wants to lose a patient. The surgeon would have demanded the untainted blood products or no operation. The surgeon has all the power in such situations. If the surgeon wanted a particular blood product and it was available, she would have got it. And of course untainted blood was available and no governnent, court or judge can stand in the way of that demand. It's really kind of simple if you understand the responsibility that the surgeon has. Of course the government is going to try to spin another story because they don't really want patients to know how much power the surgeon has in cases like this.
In a way, this gets to the core of the issue, which has two main points. 1) The request was not difficult or time-consuming to fulfill, and hence would not delay the surgery. 2) Even if those insisting that ALL blood products are safe are correct, fulfilling this request has no downside from a medical perspective--and no one has said that it does. This is the big "tell"--it shows you that this government overreach was driven purely by politics rather than science and medicine.
They could say any damn thing they want and majority, maybe lrss? Would believe them. Just quote WHO in there
It was the surgeon's demand. Nobody can overide her demands. Not the government, the courts or a judge. Don't give any credit to the conscience of the beaurocracy. There is none. Credit to the surgeon who went up against a massive force. But she knew the power she had at the operating table where she is "god" for the duration of the surgery. It seems everyone misread as to where the power lay in this decision as to what blood product would be used for this surgery. Now everyone who is about to have surgery should be having a serious discussion with their surgeon.
We Need our own surgeons. Frankly, I'd rather be on a civil war table
The international conversation better occur soon before bad blood circulates even more among recipients. Maybe McCullough and Cole and a few of their hacks could compare research and clinical judgments.
Just guessing. If this was a Māori family they would have honored the parents demands.
No doubt
So let's put it right out there. When a life, ONE life, is on the line. When everything that actually matters matters. The despicable government chose PUREBLOOD. God willing, Baby Will survives. And if its true, that he actually received un-mRNA-injected blood then his parents are heroes.
Underrated comment.
Why go through all the drama and heartache for the parents, then just to turn around to acquiesce? This implies that the State knows vaxxed blood is dangerous OR it is weighing the risk of surgery with vaxxed blood, where if the baby dies (whether the blood is to blame or not) then all hell will break loose.
Exactly.
You said it best. Complete and total non-violent-non-compliance. It has a nice ring to it. Will it work?
Feels like right now the narrative of the goodies is getting more traction than the baddies. Then again, I could be the sucker and they are masterminding the whole show. If Bobby Malone is suddenly moved to head of a "new , transparent and effective" WHO or CDC, that'll be my sign it's all a Truman Show.
I wanna see RFK there instead. Malone has a multimillion dollar lawsuit against folks for disrespecting his addition of "psychosis" to the end of "mass formation."
Agree. Malone would be my bad sign as I suspect he is (witting or not) controlled opp.
Roberto Morta-Della is showing up on a lot of lists.
Praying.
Always
Why did they not offer that at the beginning rather than put the parents through such an ordeal.
If the hint is accurate, that's great news.