I think Trump probably got about 75% of what he’d like have accomplished. But political (and military realities) reached an untenable point where proceeding to accomplish the 25% deficit would have been too costly and unpredictable. His mixed messaging was to satisfy a multiplicity of globally interested powers. Perhaps it has already reached a stage where unpredictable dynamics may be inevitable. For him to pledge that the US will not interfere with Iran’s internal governance and to recognize the IRCG ‘s right to remain, probably signifies that he viewed its remaining cards too strong to further gamble with. Ultimately, Trump moved the needle as far as he dared, especially given that elections are upcoming.
The question you should have asked was not whether Iran will sign the deal, yes, but whether Iran will adhere to the deal, no. If what you wrote in this article is the extent of the deal, then it’s a one way deal that favors Iran and imho the US should not sign it.
It was never about a nuclear threat from Iran any more than it was about weapons of mass destruction in Iraq in 2003. It was about creating conditions for Trump's GREAT Trust plan to unlock yuge profits from turning Gaza, The West Bank and parts of Israel into a real-estate re-development project to create The Riviera of The Middle East. Opposition to the plan within both Israel and Iran needed to be eliminated in order for it to proceed without the threat of interference from Iran and its proxies. That now appears to have been achieved. There will be big changes across the region; but the financial and human costs of getting us here have been shocking :(
Pretty sure the US and Iran signing a deal is a signal for Israel to bomb everyone and break the deal.
I think Trump probably got about 75% of what he’d like have accomplished. But political (and military realities) reached an untenable point where proceeding to accomplish the 25% deficit would have been too costly and unpredictable. His mixed messaging was to satisfy a multiplicity of globally interested powers. Perhaps it has already reached a stage where unpredictable dynamics may be inevitable. For him to pledge that the US will not interfere with Iran’s internal governance and to recognize the IRCG ‘s right to remain, probably signifies that he viewed its remaining cards too strong to further gamble with. Ultimately, Trump moved the needle as far as he dared, especially given that elections are upcoming.
The jihads honor no agreements
And the Americans do?!
Yes they do. Jihads never do. They lie to the infidels. It’s called Tawriya.
Ahem...:
https://search.brave.com/search?q=Which+agreements+have+the+Americans+broken+in+the+past+century%3F&source=web&summary=1&conversation=0933012c5e05d25338d8b0aaa56a03299eea
It's called dishonorable and untrustworthy.
Of course we have a deal. It's Friday!
The question you should have asked was not whether Iran will sign the deal, yes, but whether Iran will adhere to the deal, no. If what you wrote in this article is the extent of the deal, then it’s a one way deal that favors Iran and imho the US should not sign it.
The winner normally gets the one way deals, no?
Have a reality check:
https://www.zerohedge.com/geopolitical/former-mi6-spy-alastair-crooke-iran-takes-its-chances-war
The problem with these peace deals is they don't last long. They always break the deal. Never keep their promises.
It was never about a nuclear threat from Iran any more than it was about weapons of mass destruction in Iraq in 2003. It was about creating conditions for Trump's GREAT Trust plan to unlock yuge profits from turning Gaza, The West Bank and parts of Israel into a real-estate re-development project to create The Riviera of The Middle East. Opposition to the plan within both Israel and Iran needed to be eliminated in order for it to proceed without the threat of interference from Iran and its proxies. That now appears to have been achieved. There will be big changes across the region; but the financial and human costs of getting us here have been shocking :(
Terrorist can never be trusted to keep their word.
Even if they do sign a deal it won’t matter because they will break it !!!
I thought the US doesn’t negotiate with terrorist ???
The Epstein class are also terrorists. They just have better propaganda techniques.
Andrea
I think you make an excellent point.
Thanks for the reply and adding to the conversation.
Well done !!!
Who are the terrorists? Iran? 😂
Who started this nonsense? Are you that dumb?