106 Comments
User's avatar
DAM on the beach's avatar

Abolish property taxes.

Lew's avatar

Originally. You had to own property to vote. The women' suffrage amendment was a disguise to give everyone the right to vote. If I am living off government welfare, I will vote to raise your(property owner) taxes every time.

bob rinaldi's avatar

It also opened the door to women deeply involved in politics. I'm not saying that there haven't been some good woman leaders but way to many are not at all qualified .Just take a look at all the Demoncrats,and teachers union and dei corporate leaders .Woman are gifted by God in so many ways but men are made to lead as per woman are to emotional

Effra's avatar

Don’t be gullible: “ending taxation” means the tokenization of all assets, which will be placed in a blockchain. Access to “your” tokens will be controlled by AI, through a live-time social credit and carbon credit score.

The Cultured Insubordinate's avatar

Is that the only way to interpret what he intends? Black pill isn’t the only potential path, but it is the easiest.

Effra's avatar

NONE of these politicians are working for you. Read John Coleman’s “The Committee of 300.”

The Cultured Insubordinate's avatar

I’m well aware of that. I’m 50 and awake since 2000 so I’ll assume deeper in this game than you are. But, there’s always more to consider than what you stated. Black pilling is the easy way out.

Effra's avatar

Catherine Austin Fitts explains the dangers of tokenization, the blockchain, and Digital ID very well.

The Cultured Insubordinate's avatar

I know. I follow her work. But this lacks a wider POV and falls into a polarized angle. That’s my issue. There’s more to it.

Tom Childs's avatar

Why do you believe that ending income tax would result in the tokenization of all assets controlled by blockchain AI?

Tirion's avatar

Maybe because tokenization could give them total kontrol of everything, perhaps using the "Everything" app? So much cheaper and more efficient than clunky government agencies.

https://economictimes.indiatimes.com/news/international/global-trends/elon-musk-has-a-job-offer-for-hardcore-software-engineers-he-has-just-one-condition/articleshow/117290931.cms

Effra's avatar

Because I’ve read the planning white papers from the BIS, the IMF, the UN, and the WEF.

reality speaks's avatar

If you want to give power back to the people you have to defund the swamp in DC. Money is the only thing that they care about. Look at what happened after WW2 the theft of our money never went back down. Repealing the amendment that allows taxation of income will kill off the DC swamp.

2001_Odd's avatar

If this article is correct, and I haven't looked into it myself, it was never ratified? Which make it illegitimate and just take it to SCOTUS and rule it as such?

Joby's avatar

Exactly. No Tax and No Vaxx!

Crazygoatlady's avatar

And do some research on the Titanic. Both acts passed after it sank. Research who was on the boat......

The more you know.

J.M. Calabrese's avatar

G. Edward Griffen's "The Creature from Jekyll Island" explained 30 years ago how taxation was for appearances only, since the Fed/Treasury could create money out of thin after cutting ties with the gold standard.

So f**k taxes, the Fed, and the IRS. Let them slither back to the private sector. Oh, I forgot - "the Fed" IS the private banking sector controlling an entire country's financial system.

Jan DAWE's avatar

PLUS 'Interest'! LOL! ALL of the money coming out of your 'Fed', ALREADY has Debt 'Attached' to it!

Here in OZtopia (Australia), ALL of the 4 Major Banks, Have the SAME 4 Top controlling 'Investors'!= J.P. Morgan/ HSBC/ National Nominees/ CitiGroup. And it seems that the RBA ( Reserve Bank of Australia), REALLY IS just 1 of their Kept PETS! Mind you, with the OZtopian Federal Government - COMMONWEALTH OF AUSTRALIA, BEING, a Registered U.S. Corporation,- Head Quarter'd in Washington, D.C., NOT Canberra/ A.C.T/ AUSTRALIA, Aware Populations SHOULD know the Meanings of 'Foreign', Corporations, Constitutions, & F.I.A.T Monetary Systems- PLUS what their 'Operations' entail! CONVID & 'Exercises like it', are set up for more than 1 reason - 'Health' being the Main 'Diversion' for 'Acceptance' by the Programmed masses! Our - Sorry, - THE A.T.O just like the I.R.S., was created in Australia Illegally & NOT as a Gazetted Government office/Department - Proven by Lack of Official documentation by the A.T.O in Court! WHY are these ILLEGAL 'EntiTies' STILL operating? - Merrill Lynch - Bank of America, 'Handles' OZtopian Taxpayer funds, Just as under the UNIDROIT Treaty of Rome, 'Apparently' Foreigners 'Access' ALL of OUR Resources, for Realistically 'FREE' (A few crumbs & 'Jobs' surrendered to make it seem 'Equitable'[ALL claimed back as Operational costings, by the P.R'd Benevolent Corporations]) - A 'WEB' FOR SURE, NOT in the Interests of the 'Local' Citizens! - ANYWHERE!

Wellness

Jay Skywatcher's avatar

With income tax we are punished for hard steady work. The harder we work the more we pay. With welfare and unemployment people are rewarded for sitting on their ass.

DAM on the beach's avatar

Allodial titles not fee simple.

Pinco Pallino's avatar

Personal Property taxes is even worse. You never really own your property. If you can’t pay thr taxes in it, they come and take your house, your car, your land. We really do own nothing. We just have the privilege to pay for it and pay to keep it once ‘your property’ is paid for.

2nd Smartest Guy in the World's avatar

Founding Fathers wanted us all to have ALLODIAL PROPERTY TITLE so that we actually owned private property.

Property taxes are one of the most important planks in Karl Marx's 10 Planks of the Communist Manifesto.

Pinco Pallino's avatar

Amen.

I lived for many years under Communism 2.0 in Italy. Everything is taxed. Everyone is basically an employee of the state. Everything they’ve implemented there is being implemented here. The vast majority of Italians actually believe they live in a democratic state. It’s Communist where it matters … throughout the entire bureaucracy. They don’t care who the Prime Minister is. They’ll come and go. But the grip they have on the system is permanent.

Citizen_Jimserac's avatar

The IRS and the deliberately deceptively named "Federal" Reserve which, despite its clever name, is a PRIVATE bank.

That's what it has been all about, all along hasn't it ?

What Democrat EVER brought up this topic ?

And now, finally we have someone who is bringing it up.

The naysayers will rise up and warn us of the "dire" consequences of doing this. They will advance arguments of even greater fear mongering and utter nonsense than those which the climate "crisis" fanatics now assail us.

MAYBE THE TIME HAS COME TO TALK ABOUT THIS AND CONSIDER HISTORY AND HOW IT WOULD HAVE BEEN HAD NEITHER OF THESE TWO SUBVERSIONS EVER BEEN ALLOWED.

THE TIME HAS COME TO DECIDE AND HERE IS WHAT STRIKES FEAR INTO THE GLOBALISTS AND THE BANKERS AND THE BILLIONAIRES AND THE CORPORATISTAS AND THE TECHNO-FACISTS AND ALL THE REST OF THOSE WHO DESIRE CONTROL AND THE SOUL DESTROYING SUBVERSION OF THE VALUES WE HOLD DEAR.....

WE CITIZENS. WE HAVE THE POWER TO DECIDE THIS. AND SOMETHING CALLED THE CONSTITUTION OF THE UNITED STATES GAVE US THAT POWER. WHAT THEY NOW FEAR MOST IS THAT WE RISE UP AND USE IT.

Juju's avatar

I say give tariffs a try. No way can it hurt our country and families more than taxation already has. And if it does we figure something else out at that time. But leaving taxation in place is killing people’s chance at a true livelihood that could make our country stronger.

And the arguments against the idea just leaves the disease in place to grow - it’s lunacy. If something in the water is toxic to life, you don’t leave it in there thinking not having it could be worse. It needs to be completely eradicated before you take another step.

Rebel Rooster's avatar

Looks like a bait-and-switch scam to me. Tariffs increase the cost of goods sold to the consumer, so we're paying for the tariff in the end. The Feds can dictate any percentage they want; 10%, 25%, hell 100%, and we won't see the impact until we buy something. It's too late then for us to do anything about the tariff (tax). They (the Feds) will pick the winners and losers. If a business doesn't toe-the-line and bow down to the whims of the government (censorship, hire government cronies, mandate vaccines, etc.) they'll lay an outrageous tariff on your product and put you out of business.

Remember, the deadly war in our nation's history was fought over tariffs. 600,000 soldiers were slaughtered, some estimates that include civilians deaths put the total at over 1,000,000. All because the Feds used tariffs to penalize half of the country.

Just to be clear, I'm for getting rid of all taxes. But I get a bad feeling with all the talking about tariffs.

Citizen_Jimserac's avatar

Disagree.

What we have now is a system in which chains of stores put independents out of business by arranging prices and using corporations that lower quality and reduce portion size to increase profits. These mega corporations often are foreign based and use what is, for all practical purposes, slave labor, even if it seems beneficial to the slaves. The digital world makes it possible to enslave the entire planet with a "Great Reset" which can be presented as something beneficial and wonderful, and has been, by organizations like the WEF.

In the world that I came from, something called COMPETITION encouraged small biz people to lower prices while offering more. Large business were encouraged to innovate in order to offer MORE for LESS MONEY, in order to remain competitive and win the competition.

It is a drastically different philosophy and environment than that to which we are used to now. It requires greater responsibility on the part of the buyer and the adherence to standards, quality and truthfulness. Banks would compete for your deposits and offer interest on your deposits, a deflationary effect would occur in which the value of money rises and can buy more because the hidden thief/siphoning of the Fed's money printing sprees and reserve requirements for banks along with the paralyzing robbery of taxation for which a secretary pays a higher percentage of her income than a billionaire, would be gone.

There would be dangers of course, like banks run by swindlers but we must factor in that this is the digital world of the 21st century, even with politicians who lie, the world would be different, for the better.

It is a drastic, big step to this world, naysayers and denunciations would be rampant. But it may be the only way out. The only way.

Jan DAWE's avatar

Do you Guys Still 'Manufacture' MOST OF your required goods, INSIDE the U.S. anymore? WE DON'T!

WE, get 'Ripped' on Everything - Especially Global 'Exchange Rates'- And WE AIN'T 'Struggling' with Pro Rata Debt & Lack of Broad spectrum resources!

Last; NO ONE makes it to in sight of the 'White House' (OR anywhere else -TrumpPET Inclusive! THEY are 'Installed'), without being CONtrolled via some 'mechanism'! Popularisms, are by Strategic Design = NO ONE 'Gives up' that much ALL Metric 'Control' UNLESS, 'THEY' Control the 'Alternatives', by Whatever it be 'Named'! Eg; Do Folks at large 'Expect', that the Historic Controlling F.I.A.T 'Style' Usurers, WOULDN'T be 'Involved' in the Crypto System - & just let it run 'Freely'? = Really?!

Sun Tzu (5th Century Chinese strategist) - The Art of War! - Upgrade 5th GW (Sino again, near 1999) 5th Gen Warfare. The Art of Challenging of Individuals 'Perception of Reality'.

Please carry on MIS/DIScussing The TheaTricks of 'E'CONomics! LOL!

CONtrol IS ALL - 'Coin' comes by Default!

Wellness from West OZtopia ( Australia) outpost.

Rebel Rooster's avatar

I'm a bit confused. Are you arguing for tariffs on foreign based corporations? Most everything you wrote I agree with. No CBDC. End the Fed. If the USG would reduce regulations and lower (or eliminate) taxes we would be competitive on the world market. Tariffs penalize the consumer. Look at sugar: We Americans pay $0.80 per kilogram, EU pays $0.35, because of the tariff.

Citizen_Jimserac's avatar

"Are you arguing for tariffs on foreign based corporations?".

I am !

"Tariffs penalize the consumer."

Disagree. It depends and how and on what country they are used.

And they protect the producer.

Do you really want cheap junk from China produced by slave labor ?

Take another look at those videos on YT of New York and the 1940's, 50's, 60's. Note the clothes. Ever see real clothes made of real materials ?

It is the same for cars, engines, bldg. materials, medicines... etc..

Once the "regulatory" agencies are reformed, our products will be competitive even with the tarrifs. But the average pay will go down, it will SEEM as though everyone is earning less, but they will son discover that their LESS dollars are buying MORE !!

That's the trick, isn't it ? In order for this to work it won't be mere imposition of tariffs. There would be systemic changes throughout the government, society, the workplace. How do i know this ? Because I grew up in that world, I remember it well. If you are young and cannot imagine such. a world, it will take some getting used to, some understanding of the intent and opportunity unleashing power of such a world. It is an alternative which the majority of economists, sociologists, philosophers, corporatistas of today would find unthinkable, unacceptable, unimagineable. But it was real and it worked, to the benefit of all.

Think about it. Simple working class people making as little as $30-$40 per week were able to build simple one family homes across the country in the first 5 decades of the 1900's while those of today can barely afford rent, are priced out of college or homebuying and are turned into credit card interest playing slaves but out of control inflation and interest rates.

Which would you really prefer ???

Rebel Rooster's avatar

I think we agree more than we disagree. You appear to be optimistic that tariffs would be the start of a chain reaction, that "There would be systemic changes throughout the government, society, the workplace." Whereas I'm pessimist that our government would fairly implement the changes necessary to level the playing field to make us competitive. From what I've seen in my six decades I believe they would create loopholes, carve outs, "favored nation" exemptions, and waivers for the tariff implementation. Amazon and Walmart would lobby (bribe) our congress for reduced tariffs that Mom & Pop wouldn't get. Hypothetically, if these tariffs were imposed across the board on everything and everyone evenly it would be beneficial to our industrial base but I doubt that would happen. For example, if all foreign automobiles had the same tariff imposed, that would aid in rebuilding our auto industry. I foresee a tariff of 100% on Chinese autos, 50% on the Japanese, and 5% on the Germans. In my view, that doesn't solve the problem. I don't trust our government to do the right thing.

I too would like to see us return to an economy where a single income was enough to afford a modest home, one or two cars and a family vacation once a year but the globalization genie was let out of the bottle and he doesn't want to go back in without a huge fight. Good discussion, thanks.

Michelle's avatar

OMG AMEN!!!!!!!! TIME FOR WE THE PEOPLE TO RISE UP!!!!

Tom Childs's avatar

It seems likely that the Goliaths who comprise the Federal Reserve would want something in exchange for releasing the US from its Debt/s. Could that be carving out (for them) the National Parks to pay the Debt? Could it be a ginormous “Preferential Business Deal” that could industrialize from Coast to Coast?

Tirion's avatar

They already hold The District of Columbia plus all federal land and buildings as collateral against the loans still outstanding from The Revolutionary and Civil Wars. It suits them well to keep us in perpetual debt.

Furthermore, on 09Mar1933, the federal government was declared bankrupt and dissolved, along with the Republic. A new currency was created. Quote: "“The new money (paper promissory notes) is issued to the banks in return for Government obligations, bills of exchange, drafts, notes, trade acceptances, and banker’s acceptances. The new money will be worth 100 cents on the dollar, because it is backed by the credit of the nation. It will represent a mortgage on all the homes and other property of all the people in the Nation.” Senate Document No. 43, 73rd Congressional Record, 1st Session.

"The Transition To A New Financial System"

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=V1RLiqPJALY

Ian Smith's avatar

Who is going to buy the product of all that industry coast to coast? As it is now the world is glutted with everything imaginable, and it's only going to get worse as robotics replace jobs. Look at Europe it's a basket case, up until very recently Germany was the powerhouse of manufacturing in Europe. Virtually overnight it's toast. japan Korea and now China between them have captured all manufacturing and that isn't going to change anytime soon. Just recently Trump put a hundred percent tariff on Chinese electric cars Ping retaliated by not buying American corn and soy beans. Currency wars, trade wars, then real wars. Prepare for your not too distant future as a scene from Mad Max.

curt s sanders's avatar

Sounds wonderful real world application needs careful analysis.. I could see how AI can be applied here with digital currency, which I do not trust.. There's a way to do it. We just need to make sure it doesn't require some sort of Big Brother control system like the WEF was devising..

A bait and switch program..

Tirion's avatar

The way they have already chosen to do it is the "Everything" app, which apparently Musk is already coding. It's all about kontrol, implanted in your head, connected with the Internet of Bodies. As with smartphones, it - ie, transhumanism - kontrol will be sold to us as offering convenience and simplicity :(

Te Reagan's avatar

I don’t trust ze plan…

American State National's avatar

Ah hah ha ha ha ! Thats funny. Why take away another "Voluntary" opt in and give us a not voluntary AI chip that controls our brains?!?! Hmm tough choice.

Joziek's avatar

Nothing in this life is free.....id like to know what the trade off will be....