I’m not a big fan of the venom, but I have to say that the graphics, at least to my eye, don’t, by themselves, make a convincing case. Maybe it’s just a little too subtle for me.
I could believe that the red line doesn’t change in a statistically significant way from left to right. Maybe it does, but I don’t think it looks like it does.
I’m not a big fan of the venom, but I have to say that the graphics, at least to my eye, don’t, by themselves, make a convincing case. Maybe it’s just a little too subtle for me.
I could believe that the red line doesn’t change in a statistically significant way from left to right. Maybe it does, but I don’t think it looks like it does.
The second graph is more damning, especially seeing the second dose against the first, so many fewer, presumably due to adverse events from first, and large bump in cardiac events after second shot and huge bump in cardiac events after injection the recovered. That may be a stronger effect than only shots themselves.
I’m not a big fan of the venom, but I have to say that the graphics, at least to my eye, don’t, by themselves, make a convincing case. Maybe it’s just a little too subtle for me.
I could believe that the red line doesn’t change in a statistically significant way from left to right. Maybe it does, but I don’t think it looks like it does.
The second graph is more damning, especially seeing the second dose against the first, so many fewer, presumably due to adverse events from first, and large bump in cardiac events after second shot and huge bump in cardiac events after injection the recovered. That may be a stronger effect than only shots themselves.