One of the most disappointing things, out of very many disappointing things, that I associate with Trump 2.0 is the fact that so little decisive action has been taken against big Pharma, and the medical-industrial complex. Not only have vigorous actions not been taken against “vaccines“ but absolutely nothing has been done to investigate whether the principal instigators and perpetrators of these crimes knew what they were doing and thus should be prosecuted for committing crimes against humanity.
Agreed. Everything points to this administration bowing to the pharma and agra industrial complexs, going the way of profits at the expense of human health.
Unfortunately, yes, it does seem that way. Trump was the best of the lot, but unfortunately that setting the bar very low and that enables a lot of us to overlook his serious flaws. To be fair, one person can’t do it by himself. Still he could’ve done a lot more.
And here is the kicker, 2nd... I've been in practice for 35 years. This shit was being called out in books that I own, back before anyone but Al Gore had heard of the WWW. I'm pretty sure Dr Harris Coulter dealt with this subject.
Similar to when obesity started with fake food and pesticides. Once it started being talked about it, it stopped in a hurry. Too much money to be made on people not paying attention and going along with the program. Another pill or shot ought to fix it. And something for your side effects too but nothing to cure you anymore. Bizarre how that's happened and most don't notice or care. Oh well..
Below, is a quote taken from the book "The-Unvaccinated" that is also listed below.
"The statistical certainty of these findings defies dismissal. With a 99% confidence level and an error margin of less than 0.04%, the survey calculated overwhelming odds that vaccines are responsible for over 90% of disabling chronic conditions in adults. The number is so large it requires scientific notation: 1 in 2.45 x 10^62. To put this in perspective, physicists accept the existence of theoretical particles at "five sigma" - a 1 in 3.5 million chance of error. The Control Group's findings exceed this gold standard by a margin that makes the word "certainty" seem inadequate."
DJT had cruddy advice. My understanding is, he was supposed to have met with RFK but Fauci, that evil cockroach, got wind of that, and insisted on meeting with Trump instead of RFK. Trump stupidly trusted the cockroach — as did most of America and the world— and did his bidding.
Bear in mind, Trump warp sped things but BIDEN did the mandating, not Trump.
Now RFK has at least removed the EUA from covid, which is a huge game changer.
Let the man work. He is standing in a tsunami of opposition and yet he is slowly (more slowly than any of us would like) getting stuff done. Pls refrain from tossing OUR side under the bus or in any way adding to the tsunami. OUR side regularly hosing RFK only adds to the tsunami.
Trump needs to have the mid term elections in his favor. The opposition in the medical arena that profits from the status quo will rein down manure on him that will bury him if he pushes for the end of vaccinations.
Neither Trump, nor RFK, Jr. are absolute dictators with unlimited authority.
RFK, Jr. dismissed from the CDC advisory board that compiles the "recommended childhood vaccine schedule" those with blatant conflicts of interest - and replaced them with well qualified individuals. A federal judge in Mass. decided that he, the judge, was better qualified to determine whether someone was qualified to serve on the ACIP board - and violated the "separation of powers" in government. by suspending the changes that had been made, cutting the childhood schedule nearly in half - in a lawsuit filed by the American Academy of Pediatrics.
RFJK Jr. on SIDS and the connectin to vaccination:
- This is not just iatrogenic death (death caused by medical treatment). This is not just democide (killing by government of their own people). This is infanticide. This is murder .
Continuing to inject increasing doses of increasing numbers of vaccines, more & more of them combination vaccines - given at younger & younger ages, now even at birth, for a SEXUALLY TRANSMITTED DISEASE, for which virtually all mothers are tested , a vaccine tstd for saft for 5 days... makes zero sense.
Unless the injuries & deaths caused by injecting a cocktail of foreign substances into helpless little babies is intentional.
- The fact that NONE of the vaccines on the CDC's 'recommended childhood vaccine schedule' was EVER tested for safety against a true placebo has been documented.
Aaron Siri, attorney and author of 'Vaccines, Amen', presents the evidence:
- "The vaccine most strongly associated with SIDS, DPT, was protected for decades by the government despite knowing a large body of evidence around the world showed it killed infants — particularly when an inevitable hot lot was released. Eventually, so many injury lawsuits were filed that in 1986, the government had to give blanket immunity to the vaccine manufacturers."
In order to make it more difficult for parents and caring physicians to notice "hot lots", it reportedly became standard procedure to divide lots, and not send all the vaccines from the same lot/batch to the same area.
The biggest mistake EVER in my humble opinion - was the 1986 blanket immunity for the poison killing children! Yes, It Must be Repealed so the vaccine makers will respond with safer standards. And the parents must be educated as well, as to the extreme danger for their infants and children. They must insist on a reduction in shots and on spacing all the shots out.
I just saw a posting of a graveyard where there was a picture of a child’s headstone.
Under that picture was the message”If you go to any cemetery you will find far more children buried who died before the 1950’s. If you doubt vaccines have saved children’s lives, just go to a cemetery. It is written in stone.”
Well. Weren’t antibiotics introduced and available widely right about then?
And hey, the many studies and evidence presented regularly herein practically shout the doubt about any vaccines that have supposedly “saved” children.
The Amish present an interesting control group and those kids do not get vaccinated and don’t die of SIDS.
And don’t develop autism either.
How about childhood cancers? Mental illnesses? And on and on and on.
Surely the doctors know this. Why do they continue to inject the children they should be protecting? Does money mean more than a child's life? Hard to believe. They should tell the parents about the true risks of the multiple shots given as "routine"!
Good post, but given the environment out there the title is too strongly worded ... "Will" should be "Can" or "Has the possibility" ... would be better choices.
The inverted plausible deniability folks would have a "field day" with that title.
Thanks for the reply, I have appreciated all you do for going on 6 years now. As I studied diligently all things related. For one period of 3.5 years w/o missing single day (no exaggeration) I am not sure what you mean by "My LCD Simulation" ... but if I am reading that correct ... in it's intent.
Miss number 2.
If you meant nothing by it OK, fair enough. But w/e the case you are not reading your audience correctly ... we are running out of time. In my view ... how we speak matters.
I stand by what I said ... "Will" implies always ... and always may indeed not be accurate. That's all I meant to say.
Ok cool and thanks. I like you have looked at this stuff for years. We are aligned in our view. And the possibility in subtle ways that "will" could be real is part of my lean. It was just when I read it I wanted to share it, yet didn't because of the strong wording. So I mentioned what I was feeling.
One of the most disappointing things, out of very many disappointing things, that I associate with Trump 2.0 is the fact that so little decisive action has been taken against big Pharma, and the medical-industrial complex. Not only have vigorous actions not been taken against “vaccines“ but absolutely nothing has been done to investigate whether the principal instigators and perpetrators of these crimes knew what they were doing and thus should be prosecuted for committing crimes against humanity.
Agreed. Everything points to this administration bowing to the pharma and agra industrial complexs, going the way of profits at the expense of human health.
Unfortunately, yes, it does seem that way. Trump was the best of the lot, but unfortunately that setting the bar very low and that enables a lot of us to overlook his serious flaws. To be fair, one person can’t do it by himself. Still he could’ve done a lot more.
And here is the kicker, 2nd... I've been in practice for 35 years. This shit was being called out in books that I own, back before anyone but Al Gore had heard of the WWW. I'm pretty sure Dr Harris Coulter dealt with this subject.
Similar to when obesity started with fake food and pesticides. Once it started being talked about it, it stopped in a hurry. Too much money to be made on people not paying attention and going along with the program. Another pill or shot ought to fix it. And something for your side effects too but nothing to cure you anymore. Bizarre how that's happened and most don't notice or care. Oh well..
Below, is a quote taken from the book "The-Unvaccinated" that is also listed below.
"The statistical certainty of these findings defies dismissal. With a 99% confidence level and an error margin of less than 0.04%, the survey calculated overwhelming odds that vaccines are responsible for over 90% of disabling chronic conditions in adults. The number is so large it requires scientific notation: 1 in 2.45 x 10^62. To put this in perspective, physicists accept the existence of theoretical particles at "five sigma" - a 1 in 3.5 million chance of error. The Control Group's findings exceed this gold standard by a margin that makes the word "certainty" seem inadequate."
https://www.scribd.com/document/1050601509/The-Unvaccinated-Book-V1
President "Warp Speed" and RFK Jr could stop this right now. Since that is not happening, what does that tell you about these two?
DJT had cruddy advice. My understanding is, he was supposed to have met with RFK but Fauci, that evil cockroach, got wind of that, and insisted on meeting with Trump instead of RFK. Trump stupidly trusted the cockroach — as did most of America and the world— and did his bidding.
Bear in mind, Trump warp sped things but BIDEN did the mandating, not Trump.
Now RFK has at least removed the EUA from covid, which is a huge game changer.
Let the man work. He is standing in a tsunami of opposition and yet he is slowly (more slowly than any of us would like) getting stuff done. Pls refrain from tossing OUR side under the bus or in any way adding to the tsunami. OUR side regularly hosing RFK only adds to the tsunami.
Trump needs to have the mid term elections in his favor. The opposition in the medical arena that profits from the status quo will rein down manure on him that will bury him if he pushes for the end of vaccinations.
Neither Trump, nor RFK, Jr. are absolute dictators with unlimited authority.
RFK, Jr. dismissed from the CDC advisory board that compiles the "recommended childhood vaccine schedule" those with blatant conflicts of interest - and replaced them with well qualified individuals. A federal judge in Mass. decided that he, the judge, was better qualified to determine whether someone was qualified to serve on the ACIP board - and violated the "separation of powers" in government. by suspending the changes that had been made, cutting the childhood schedule nearly in half - in a lawsuit filed by the American Academy of Pediatrics.
RFJK Jr. on SIDS and the connectin to vaccination:
https://rumble.com/v7bj1km-rfk-jr.-confronts-retracted-sids-science.html?e9s=src_v1_cbl%2Csrc_v1_ucp_a
- This is not just iatrogenic death (death caused by medical treatment). This is not just democide (killing by government of their own people). This is infanticide. This is murder .
Continuing to inject increasing doses of increasing numbers of vaccines, more & more of them combination vaccines - given at younger & younger ages, now even at birth, for a SEXUALLY TRANSMITTED DISEASE, for which virtually all mothers are tested , a vaccine tstd for saft for 5 days... makes zero sense.
Unless the injuries & deaths caused by injecting a cocktail of foreign substances into helpless little babies is intentional.
- The fact that NONE of the vaccines on the CDC's 'recommended childhood vaccine schedule' was EVER tested for safety against a true placebo has been documented.
Aaron Siri, attorney and author of 'Vaccines, Amen', presents the evidence:
https://rumble.com/v7c5gma-episode-483-aaron-siri-at-the-kennedy-center-a-turning-point-for-informed-c.html?e9s=src_v1_s%2Csrc_v1_s_o&sci=b73a4c54-0e50-4431-8871-51342606bb4d
- "The vaccine most strongly associated with SIDS, DPT, was protected for decades by the government despite knowing a large body of evidence around the world showed it killed infants — particularly when an inevitable hot lot was released. Eventually, so many injury lawsuits were filed that in 1986, the government had to give blanket immunity to the vaccine manufacturers."
In order to make it more difficult for parents and caring physicians to notice "hot lots", it reportedly became standard procedure to divide lots, and not send all the vaccines from the same lot/batch to the same area.
This must STOP. Now.
The biggest mistake EVER in my humble opinion - was the 1986 blanket immunity for the poison killing children! Yes, It Must be Repealed so the vaccine makers will respond with safer standards. And the parents must be educated as well, as to the extreme danger for their infants and children. They must insist on a reduction in shots and on spacing all the shots out.
I just saw a posting of a graveyard where there was a picture of a child’s headstone.
Under that picture was the message”If you go to any cemetery you will find far more children buried who died before the 1950’s. If you doubt vaccines have saved children’s lives, just go to a cemetery. It is written in stone.”
Well. Weren’t antibiotics introduced and available widely right about then?
And hey, the many studies and evidence presented regularly herein practically shout the doubt about any vaccines that have supposedly “saved” children.
The Amish present an interesting control group and those kids do not get vaccinated and don’t die of SIDS.
And don’t develop autism either.
How about childhood cancers? Mental illnesses? And on and on and on.
Smart people, the Amish.
Surely the doctors know this. Why do they continue to inject the children they should be protecting? Does money mean more than a child's life? Hard to believe. They should tell the parents about the true risks of the multiple shots given as "routine"!
Good post, but given the environment out there the title is too strongly worded ... "Will" should be "Can" or "Has the possibility" ... would be better choices.
The inverted plausible deniability folks would have a "field day" with that title.
This is not your LCD simulation, and these folks do not matter much around these parts here...
Thanks for the reply, I have appreciated all you do for going on 6 years now. As I studied diligently all things related. For one period of 3.5 years w/o missing single day (no exaggeration) I am not sure what you mean by "My LCD Simulation" ... but if I am reading that correct ... in it's intent.
Miss number 2.
If you meant nothing by it OK, fair enough. But w/e the case you are not reading your audience correctly ... we are running out of time. In my view ... how we speak matters.
I stand by what I said ... "Will" implies always ... and always may indeed not be accurate. That's all I meant to say.
I meant it in general, not personally.
I am not reading any audiences, and write only what I consider important, with no intention of targeting anyone in particular.
Ok cool and thanks. I like you have looked at this stuff for years. We are aligned in our view. And the possibility in subtle ways that "will" could be real is part of my lean. It was just when I read it I wanted to share it, yet didn't because of the strong wording. So I mentioned what I was feeling.
Thanks again for the reply.
The use of "will" here is rhetorical, dude. Let's please all shitcan the Death by Literalism tactic. It's pedantic.
There is a message in "Vax will kill yo ass", and everyone gets it just fine.