Yes, I started going on about reverse transcriptase permanently changing the species genome about two years ago as a NYT commenter with 35 "Times Picks" accumulated until they banned me for life. Pretty much everything I wrote (a lot!) - the opposite of what they reported - has all turned out to be true. (The NYT lies to your face constantly, from Vietnam to WMDs to Covid, and likely about Ukraine) Let's remember the mainstream media does not "inform you" as they like to say, instead their job is to program you. Everyone made fun of the possibility of DNA change; guess no one knew that reverse transcriptase had been around since the 1970's and the biological possibility is real. This study needs replication and further research with the other so-called vaccines. If true, it means this vaccination "mistake" is non-reversible, except by forced sterilization or genocide of those who were vaxxed.
The problem is that people think of these genetic manipulations as vaccinations regardless of the fact that they meet neither the medical nor legal definitions of a vaccine. The manufacturers originally called them genetic therapies in their trials but WHO changed the definition of "vaccine" so they'd get under the vaccine liability umbrella - and also so people would think they were as safe as "vaccines," some of which are safe, at least the Live vaccines.
The Dead vaccines, which all require boosters - the subunit, inactivated, and toxoid vaccines - (DTP, Hep, Tetanus, Pneumonia, new Shingles, new Polio, Flu (via spike)) are Bad, with bad being defined as increasing all-cause mortality regardless of whether they positively affect their primary specific targets.
The Live vaccines (BCG (for TB), MMR, old Polio, old Shingles (Zostavax), Smallpox, Chickenpox, Flu (via nasal spray)) are Good as they have non-specific effects that decrease all-cause mortality. That the Live vaxxes are good is the opposite of what one might think, but is well studied and seems to be correct, although not well publicized or accepted or known by MDs (Malpractice Doctor).
I have never called these EUA gene therapies "vaccines" because they are anything but, and the animal studies i cited all were quite grim in their outcomes. which is why they never made it to human trials in the traditional manner.
Yes, the huge drop in mortality after 1900 was due to improved sanitation and nutrition. The smallpox vax later had some small effect - very small, about 0.1% - on the mortality decrease. But the big drop happened before vaccinations were invented, although Pharma and MDs credit vaccinations anyway, because it sounds good.
Sebastian Rushworth has a good interview with Christine Benn on Live vs Dead vaccines and their impact, via non-specific effects, on all-cause mortality.
Yes, I started going on about reverse transcriptase permanently changing the species genome about two years ago as a NYT commenter with 35 "Times Picks" accumulated until they banned me for life. Pretty much everything I wrote (a lot!) - the opposite of what they reported - has all turned out to be true. (The NYT lies to your face constantly, from Vietnam to WMDs to Covid, and likely about Ukraine) Let's remember the mainstream media does not "inform you" as they like to say, instead their job is to program you. Everyone made fun of the possibility of DNA change; guess no one knew that reverse transcriptase had been around since the 1970's and the biological possibility is real. This study needs replication and further research with the other so-called vaccines. If true, it means this vaccination "mistake" is non-reversible, except by forced sterilization or genocide of those who were vaxxed.
The problem is that people think of these genetic manipulations as vaccinations regardless of the fact that they meet neither the medical nor legal definitions of a vaccine. The manufacturers originally called them genetic therapies in their trials but WHO changed the definition of "vaccine" so they'd get under the vaccine liability umbrella - and also so people would think they were as safe as "vaccines," some of which are safe, at least the Live vaccines.
The Dead vaccines, which all require boosters - the subunit, inactivated, and toxoid vaccines - (DTP, Hep, Tetanus, Pneumonia, new Shingles, new Polio, Flu (via spike)) are Bad, with bad being defined as increasing all-cause mortality regardless of whether they positively affect their primary specific targets.
The Live vaccines (BCG (for TB), MMR, old Polio, old Shingles (Zostavax), Smallpox, Chickenpox, Flu (via nasal spray)) are Good as they have non-specific effects that decrease all-cause mortality. That the Live vaxxes are good is the opposite of what one might think, but is well studied and seems to be correct, although not well publicized or accepted or known by MDs (Malpractice Doctor).
The whole dead and live attenuated vaccine space is at best questionable. See here:
https://2ndsmartestguyintheworld.substack.com/p/revisiting-the-major-vaccines?utm_source=url
I have never called these EUA gene therapies "vaccines" because they are anything but, and the animal studies i cited all were quite grim in their outcomes. which is why they never made it to human trials in the traditional manner.
Yes, the huge drop in mortality after 1900 was due to improved sanitation and nutrition. The smallpox vax later had some small effect - very small, about 0.1% - on the mortality decrease. But the big drop happened before vaccinations were invented, although Pharma and MDs credit vaccinations anyway, because it sounds good.
Sebastian Rushworth has a good interview with Christine Benn on Live vs Dead vaccines and their impact, via non-specific effects, on all-cause mortality.
https://sebastianrushworth.com/2022/02/12/non-specific-vaccine-effects-with-dr-christine-stabell-benn/
When was "new shingles" vaccine rolled out, do you happen to know.
Good list.
July 2021 FDA, August 2020 European Commission.
Thank you buddhi. And for your link.
Lol good thing there's an unexpected war going on now to help hide all the bad news.
Wow. Great article.