I have something coming in a video that is important. I will post here as a comment and hopefully you can consider sharing to your base. Mine is small.
This is the point most commentators are missing. The president’s executive power is from the Constitution. There is nobody who overrules his executive power. Every mention of a statue, which is a legislative action, is an attempt to limit the executive power of the president. Whether it is the Espionage Act or the Presidential Records Act, the intent is to curtail the executive power. Therefore, they do not apply to the president. The very act of taking the records to Mar-A-Lago made them his records. The FBI raid to grab those records was theft. I don’t know of any other way of looking at it without thinking there is some entity or person who exercises higher executive power than the president.
STILL GO BACK TO THE ARGUMENT THAT THE PRA IS NOT A CRIMINAL LAW BUT A CIVIL LAW WHERE THE BUREAUCRATIC STATE IS TRYING TO UTILIZE ADMINISTRATIVE LAWS AND FORGE THEM INTO CRIMINAL ACTS OF ESPIONAGE! THE BUREAUCRATIC STATE IS OUT OF CONTROL AND IF ALLOWED TO CONTINUE THERE WILL BE AN INTERIOR WAR INSIDE THE USA!
They weren't so much false as the wrong ones to go with. Espionage Act would open a pandoras box bringing in Bill Clinton and any other living former President. However, he doesn't have to think about that, they found him not guilty.
Are the charges themselves are a treasonous act meant to undermine the republic. Imagine that defense.
100%
I have something coming in a video that is important. I will post here as a comment and hopefully you can consider sharing to your base. Mine is small.
Great point!!!
This is the point most commentators are missing. The president’s executive power is from the Constitution. There is nobody who overrules his executive power. Every mention of a statue, which is a legislative action, is an attempt to limit the executive power of the president. Whether it is the Espionage Act or the Presidential Records Act, the intent is to curtail the executive power. Therefore, they do not apply to the president. The very act of taking the records to Mar-A-Lago made them his records. The FBI raid to grab those records was theft. I don’t know of any other way of looking at it without thinking there is some entity or person who exercises higher executive power than the president.
there you go ... maga!!
The Constitution of the United States. Article II. Section. 1. The executive Power shall be vested in a President of the United States of America.
That was drafted in 1787 and has applied to every President we have ever had.
STILL GO BACK TO THE ARGUMENT THAT THE PRA IS NOT A CRIMINAL LAW BUT A CIVIL LAW WHERE THE BUREAUCRATIC STATE IS TRYING TO UTILIZE ADMINISTRATIVE LAWS AND FORGE THEM INTO CRIMINAL ACTS OF ESPIONAGE! THE BUREAUCRATIC STATE IS OUT OF CONTROL AND IF ALLOWED TO CONTINUE THERE WILL BE AN INTERIOR WAR INSIDE THE USA!
The process charges also are false. So like Covid we have another hoax.
They weren't so much false as the wrong ones to go with. Espionage Act would open a pandoras box bringing in Bill Clinton and any other living former President. However, he doesn't have to think about that, they found him not guilty.
So blöd. (so transwokeZombyXXXpuppet's way,
Trump gehört der "deep state", blacksun faction.
Patrick Bergy : anyone who helps the ''deep state's'' ways may be on charge, so long he is convienient to ''them''.
Montez des équipes, soyez humains entre humains, prenez garde, et courage ! ;-)
Thanks 2nd. Interesting post indeed.