The overturning of Chevron Deference means that the illegitimate Federal government and its ever metastasizing color of law agencies have finally been reigned in, with a broad range of legal implications that will rightfully and Constitutionally shift power back to We the People.
Yes, this is a huge decision, much more important than Dobbs, which kicked abortion back to the States...This decision returns decisions about the law to the courts and lawyers, not bureaucratic hacks...
Well, good luck with that. Since FASB 56 in 2018, the government's books have gone black and Congress - even if it wanted to - can therefore no longer control government spending or even know how much the government is spending, let alone on what they are spending.
So, based on everything that's happened over the last 5-10 years, we have confidence in our politicized courts and corrupt officers of the courts??? Well, me, not so much. I have lost faith in the law and the courts and am nowhere near as optimistic as you and 2SG :(
Too bad something like that wasn't in effect up here in Canuckistan...🤔 Wouldn't matter of course, because any court ruling in this third-world shithole can be overturned at any time by Act of Parliament, Cabinet Order-in-Council or any province opting out with the "notwithstanding" clause...🙄
I'm glad I read this substack because I had heard nothing about this anywhere. The Supreme Court news I did hear was regarding their decision to uphold Presidential immunity from prosecution while performing official duties. Neither Fox news, nor newsnationnow.org seem to have mentioned it, or if they did, I didn't see it. If you can suggest a good news site I'm all ears...er...eyes.
Another great substack to read is Coffee and Covid, by Jeff Childers. He’s my go-to for information, especially as he is an attorney and does a great job of explaining all the legal ramifications of these rulings and cases.
Completely agree. C&C is a great read; Childers is one of my favorite attorneys out there, as is Robert Barnes. There are still some great minds out there, working to restore sanity to the law profession!
As bad off as our country is , just imagine if Hillary won in 2016, and had appointed 3 activist justices by now. We’d see policies like chevron not only still in place , but on cattle steroids , and we’d see the persecution of conservatives green-lighted and normalized en mass, with no legal recourse .. and so much more tyranny, just pick a topic
If DJT had not come down that escalator in 2016 as the winner of the Presidential election, we likely not have Judge Collins. Trump appointed Collins to the 9th Circuit (of all places!) and we just got that ruling there involving the Los Angeles Unified School District.
In that ruling, which sent the case back to the District Court (??), Collins raised "Jacobson," the Supreme Court case that allegedly allowed the State to inject anybody at any time. In addition to overturning the Defendants' claim that the case was moot, the Court ruled that the injectable junk forced on Americans fell short of being a "vaccine," saying it was more of a treatment -- not a (traditional) vaccine. This is huge...
If you're the 2nd Smartest Guy in the world, I'm puzzled to figure out who is the Smartest Guy, because its definitely not me. Super article, well explained too how our bureaucrats got so cocky and abusive. I remember Trump saying years ago that he was going to chisel down the federal bureaucracy from its obsessiveness. DC and the suburbs were attracting employees from all over because they knew the incomes federal workers receive. Thanks for this exceptional expose on the Chevron Deference. The 80's are where Congress and the courts too, started going off the rails. What a freaking wake-up call!
People should be able to practice their way of earning an income without some BS oversight that doesn't have authority to charge then top it all off with you must be jabbed or don't work. Was this a setup to have people do nothing and get paid laziness from top all the way down to the bottom. Abortion should be between the doctor and patient, oh i forgot the government is practicing medicine without a license fine them to the hilt every second
I have been cheering since the decision... all these bs departments and agencies are finally going to be reigned in. Though I'd prefer if they were just done away with, this is a monumental hinderence to the power they stole.
So wait, essentially it is a law based on the argument that I have been making over the last four years, and that is "appeal to experts/authority to logical fallacy." These guys had a law that determined they were the experts and they could do whatever they wanted.
And here I thought the Supreme Court just reopened a bunch of Chevron stations.
Thank you for breaking this down so I can understand this. Absolutely remarkably EXCELLENT and nice foundational carpeting rollout for returning back to the intended context of our founding documents of this Republic to empower states rights, sovereign people in the states, working collaborative with a lean federal executive branch that can all work together with a congress that is by the people, of the people, for the people...did I get that right?
Yes, this is a huge decision, much more important than Dobbs, which kicked abortion back to the States...This decision returns decisions about the law to the courts and lawyers, not bureaucratic hacks...
And hopefully, it also means that there will be less government overreach.
Well, good luck with that. Since FASB 56 in 2018, the government's books have gone black and Congress - even if it wanted to - can therefore no longer control government spending or even know how much the government is spending, let alone on what they are spending.
Still too many corrupt judges to crack the Dom Perignon open yet. Especially in the blue states...
So, based on everything that's happened over the last 5-10 years, we have confidence in our politicized courts and corrupt officers of the courts??? Well, me, not so much. I have lost faith in the law and the courts and am nowhere near as optimistic as you and 2SG :(
No, but we have a great deal more faith in them than we do in overpaid bureaucrats generally acting at the behest of left wing lobbies....
I’m beginning to see some light at the end of the tunnel!
I hope it’s not a train
👍🙏
Too bad something like that wasn't in effect up here in Canuckistan...🤔 Wouldn't matter of course, because any court ruling in this third-world shithole can be overturned at any time by Act of Parliament, Cabinet Order-in-Council or any province opting out with the "notwithstanding" clause...🙄
I'm glad I read this substack because I had heard nothing about this anywhere. The Supreme Court news I did hear was regarding their decision to uphold Presidential immunity from prosecution while performing official duties. Neither Fox news, nor newsnationnow.org seem to have mentioned it, or if they did, I didn't see it. If you can suggest a good news site I'm all ears...er...eyes.
RealAmericasVoice on Steve Bannons War room explained it clearly last Friday with attorney Mike Davis.
The Substack writer of Coffee and Covid mentioned it. And anything that appears to diminish or remove power is a good. thing.
Here’s a great explanation of the Chevron doctrine and what this ruling means:
https://x.com/CynicalPublius/status/1807402918993424758
Many thanks, I will check it out.
Another great substack to read is Coffee and Covid, by Jeff Childers. He’s my go-to for information, especially as he is an attorney and does a great job of explaining all the legal ramifications of these rulings and cases.
Completely agree. C&C is a great read; Childers is one of my favorite attorneys out there, as is Robert Barnes. There are still some great minds out there, working to restore sanity to the law profession!
Thanks !!
As bad off as our country is , just imagine if Hillary won in 2016, and had appointed 3 activist justices by now. We’d see policies like chevron not only still in place , but on cattle steroids , and we’d see the persecution of conservatives green-lighted and normalized en mass, with no legal recourse .. and so much more tyranny, just pick a topic
<shudders>
That said, ACB and Kav have been shockingly disappointing choices.
At least with the libnazi activists you know what evil to expect consistently.
ACB definitely leans liberal, a product of her education at Notre Dame .
Trying to remember where I read ND renamed "Notre Flame" for all of the freakishness going on there: https://www.theamericanconservative.com/mccarrick-catholic-church-how-the-lavender-mafia-works/ #LavenderMafia
Are they female Jesuit equivalent, or....?
If DJT had not come down that escalator in 2016 as the winner of the Presidential election, we likely not have Judge Collins. Trump appointed Collins to the 9th Circuit (of all places!) and we just got that ruling there involving the Los Angeles Unified School District.
In that ruling, which sent the case back to the District Court (??), Collins raised "Jacobson," the Supreme Court case that allegedly allowed the State to inject anybody at any time. In addition to overturning the Defendants' claim that the case was moot, the Court ruled that the injectable junk forced on Americans fell short of being a "vaccine," saying it was more of a treatment -- not a (traditional) vaccine. This is huge...
If you have time/interest, here is a link to the Court's proceedings: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Q0zg5JSJ9Ok About a half hour. Watch Collins demolish Jacobson...
This is excellent news. Thank you for posting this.
So does this mean that mandatory vaccination for anything would be unconstituitional?
If you're the 2nd Smartest Guy in the world, I'm puzzled to figure out who is the Smartest Guy, because its definitely not me. Super article, well explained too how our bureaucrats got so cocky and abusive. I remember Trump saying years ago that he was going to chisel down the federal bureaucracy from its obsessiveness. DC and the suburbs were attracting employees from all over because they knew the incomes federal workers receive. Thanks for this exceptional expose on the Chevron Deference. The 80's are where Congress and the courts too, started going off the rails. What a freaking wake-up call!
People should be able to practice their way of earning an income without some BS oversight that doesn't have authority to charge then top it all off with you must be jabbed or don't work. Was this a setup to have people do nothing and get paid laziness from top all the way down to the bottom. Abortion should be between the doctor and patient, oh i forgot the government is practicing medicine without a license fine them to the hilt every second
I have been cheering since the decision... all these bs departments and agencies are finally going to be reigned in. Though I'd prefer if they were just done away with, this is a monumental hinderence to the power they stole.
So wait, essentially it is a law based on the argument that I have been making over the last four years, and that is "appeal to experts/authority to logical fallacy." These guys had a law that determined they were the experts and they could do whatever they wanted.
And here I thought the Supreme Court just reopened a bunch of Chevron stations.
🤣
The true meaning of this decision has been grossly understated
Do you have a link to more information on PetMectin? Sounds like something I need.
Could this be the "Q" scenario slipping in quietly through the back door?
So so sick after taking the protocol for 2 days. What to do?
Thank you for breaking this down so I can understand this. Absolutely remarkably EXCELLENT and nice foundational carpeting rollout for returning back to the intended context of our founding documents of this Republic to empower states rights, sovereign people in the states, working collaborative with a lean federal executive branch that can all work together with a congress that is by the people, of the people, for the people...did I get that right?