“The roll out of the new C-Band 5G service by AT&T and Verizon scheduled for January 19, has raised alarms for major airline executives who have warned that it will create “catastrophic” interference with flight navigation systems and pilot safety during take off and landing. The risks will be greater during bad weather.
Most items you have written on regarding vaxxines, mandates, even origin or existence of the "virus" I have mostly agreed on =- = I, myself, am a physicist and mathematician strongly grounded in electronics. --
The wavelengths harmful to humans, other than by heating the object or body --- are ionizing wavelengths -- in the ultraviolet (UV) and shorter wavelengths, namely shorter than 300 nanometers (300 nm) or 300 billionths of a meter. That is 3/1,000,000 centimeter (cm), or 3 millionths of a cm - or, in inches, about 1 millionths of an inch (1/1,000,000 of an inch).
Longer wavelengths than UV are virtually harmless to humans, as they don't damage cells or the body - unless in very high power. If high power, the only effect is heating the flesh - like in a microwave oven, which has a power of maybe 1,000 watts. The wavelength of a microwave oven, operating at 2.455 GHz is about 12 centimeters (cm)
"C" band 5G has a power level of a maximum of a tenth of a watt (1/10 watts) near humans, that is, the power levels of 5G are ~ 10,000 times tinier than a microwave oven.
And C band frequencies are about 3.7 GHz to 4 GHZ, or about 8 centimeters. That is, the wavelength of C band is 8 million times longer than would be harmful, like UV. Comparing 5G C band to Ultraviolet light would be like comparing warm summer tiny rain droplets of 5G to the machine gun bullets of UV !!
My main concern with 5G and 6G is how invasive it is, as the higher frequencies allow big brother to more effectively be Orwellian in keeping its eyes on us!!
Good morning! Well, as far as using 5G for surveillance for "crowd control" purposes, yes. But the reasons for a bunch of towers is that the range, even in air, is limited. 10-11 GHz used to be used for satellite to ground data -- but a big rain or snow laden cloud, would attenuate the signal! I doubt they would use much higher frequencies, as object, leaves, etc. can make coverage spotty due to similar "shielding".
To use 5G as an "energy weapon", you'd need power levels 1000s of times higher - and the real danger was "heating" if you used directed microwaves (5G, 6G are defined in microwave frequencies) as weapons. By the way, to put fear to rest, even the upper limit of 5G into 6G, 60 GHz - wavelength is ~ a half centimeter (~1/4 inch) which is still like summer raindrops on the face compared to "machine gun bullets" from UV wavelengths of about 1/1,000,000 of an inch! My main concern is Orwellian surveillance from the bandwidth the higher frequencies will allow! They could operate all 3 cameras and microphones on your cell phone simultaneously and triangulate where, when, what one was doing, who ...etc.. what the heck!
The "C" band of 5G could possibly interfere with radio altimeters, as many radio altimeters operate at a frequency of a bit above 4 GHz -- and, if some cheapo 5G wifi or other services were poorly frequency controlled, they could "drift" into the radio altimeter frequencies -- and endanger aircraft..... much like if you have adjacent channel interference on an AM radio.
Most items you have written on regarding vaxxines, mandates, even origin or existence of the "virus" I have mostly agreed on =- = I, myself, am a physicist and mathematician strongly grounded in electronics. --
The wavelengths harmful to humans, other than by heating the object or body --- are ionizing wavelengths -- in the ultraviolet (UV) and shorter wavelengths, namely shorter than 300 nanometers (300 nm) or 300 billionths of a meter. That is 3/1,000,000 centimeter (cm), or 3 millionths of a cm - or, in inches, about 1 millionths of an inch (1/1,000,000 of an inch).
Longer wavelengths than UV are virtually harmless to humans, as they don't damage cells or the body - unless in very high power. If high power, the only effect is heating the flesh - like in a microwave oven, which has a power of maybe 1,000 watts. The wavelength of a microwave oven, operating at 2.455 GHz is about 12 centimeters (cm)
"C" band 5G has a power level of a maximum of a tenth of a watt (1/10 watts) near humans, that is, the power levels of 5G are ~ 10,000 times tinier than a microwave oven.
And C band frequencies are about 3.7 GHz to 4 GHZ, or about 8 centimeters. That is, the wavelength of C band is 8 million times longer than would be harmful, like UV. Comparing 5G C band to Ultraviolet light would be like comparing warm summer tiny rain droplets of 5G to the machine gun bullets of UV !!
My main concern with 5G and 6G is how invasive it is, as the higher frequencies allow big brother to more effectively be Orwellian in keeping its eyes on us!!
Yes, 5G seems to be for mostly total perpetual surveillance purposes. But could not thousands upon thousands of small 5G towers in, say, NYC, be used for "crowd control" since 5G originated from that kind of military tech? (https://principia-scientific.com/5g-is-a-u-s-dept-of-defense-weaponized-crowd-control-system/)
And from there we could extrapolate in highly saturated zones/cities other "applications"???
Good morning! Well, as far as using 5G for surveillance for "crowd control" purposes, yes. But the reasons for a bunch of towers is that the range, even in air, is limited. 10-11 GHz used to be used for satellite to ground data -- but a big rain or snow laden cloud, would attenuate the signal! I doubt they would use much higher frequencies, as object, leaves, etc. can make coverage spotty due to similar "shielding".
To use 5G as an "energy weapon", you'd need power levels 1000s of times higher - and the real danger was "heating" if you used directed microwaves (5G, 6G are defined in microwave frequencies) as weapons. By the way, to put fear to rest, even the upper limit of 5G into 6G, 60 GHz - wavelength is ~ a half centimeter (~1/4 inch) which is still like summer raindrops on the face compared to "machine gun bullets" from UV wavelengths of about 1/1,000,000 of an inch! My main concern is Orwellian surveillance from the bandwidth the higher frequencies will allow! They could operate all 3 cameras and microphones on your cell phone simultaneously and triangulate where, when, what one was doing, who ...etc.. what the heck!
Thank you for your thoughtful comments.
The fun times don't stop
The "C" band of 5G could possibly interfere with radio altimeters, as many radio altimeters operate at a frequency of a bit above 4 GHz -- and, if some cheapo 5G wifi or other services were poorly frequency controlled, they could "drift" into the radio altimeter frequencies -- and endanger aircraft..... much like if you have adjacent channel interference on an AM radio.
Yep, I think the surveillance aspect of 5G is equally of concern.
https://nakedemperor.substack.com/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/labs/pmc/articles/PMC8580522/
https://microondes.wordpress.com/2010/04/17/robert-c-kane-cellular-telephone-russian-roulette/