Whenever Substack feels it has profiteered enough from Censorship to provide captions, I might check it out.
Maybe. I don't generally see the point, I can find plenty of alternative news on YouTube, way more than I have time for, and including a lot of the exact same videos.
It's not a viable thing for deaf people, no choice involved.
But people who are amateurs and only have a few vids are able to caption their videos, showing without doubt, Bitchute and the rest are as callous as the Average Lefty.
That makes their integrity an illusion, and make clear it's all about turning a buck.
You are obviously well qualified to see and know these things.
Whenever Substack feels it has profiteered enough from Censorship to provide captions, I might check it out.
Maybe. I don't generally see the point, I can find plenty of alternative news on YouTube, way more than I have time for, and including a lot of the exact same videos.
It's not a viable thing for deaf people, no choice involved.
But people who are amateurs and only have a few vids are able to caption their videos, showing without doubt, Bitchute and the rest are as callous as the Average Lefty.
That makes their integrity an illusion, and make clear it's all about turning a buck.
I also require captions. The bigger services should offer this.