In most cases, I think the censors had a choice: Censor and get paid or, don't censor and you get unemployment along with an IRS audit. Take your pick. The crime was committed by the feds, not with their 'assets'.
As with so much that’s wrong with our situation and “government”, if a small handful push back and stand, they risk a great deal of trouble. But I can’t help but think that if all of us posting our views here and on other alternative resources stood against the government’s obvious unconstitutional laws, actions, EO’s etc, they simply would be powerless to move against all of us. Nullification as the Founders envisioned.
JFK wanted to smash the CIA and FBI into a million pieces. Time to finish the job and do the same to all 5-eyes traitors. Actual traitors to the citizens they purportedly serve.
You are one step closer to be the 1st smartest guy. It's not the FBI, it's freemasonry. All intelligence agencies were founded by freemasons and are run by freemasons to the core. Even if you change the heads, the body doesn't respond as you have seen with Fauci et al. not obeying the President, but someone higher: their freemason/satanic superior.
Freemasons have to obey like the military, with the difference that their orders are secret and that, if they disobey, they lose their jobs or even their lives, if they reveal any important secret or membership.
So what's really more urgent is a law stating under severe penalty for non-compliance (even to their heirs if that is known after they died), that anyone should disclose if they belong to a secret society, especially those with the requirement to obey secret orders, such as all lodges and freemasonic and luciferian/satanic type of societies.
Penalties should be even more severe with all stake holders involved in or with all the 3 branches of government (even suppliers and candidates), finance (especially, banks, funds, listed corporations) and especially, the armed forces, even the police (that's the reason they' didn't protect the country against blatant constitutional violations).
If this law passes, you'd learn that all listed financial and corporate boards are controlled by freemasons, all the Democrats and especially all the Republicans voting for gender ideology were freemasons, all politicians members of the CFR or attending Sun Valley are freemasons, all dominant media CEOs are freemasons... then people will ask for change, for example, a law barring them from all such positions. There's no deep state just freemasonry. There are no conspiracies, just freemason plots. There's no democracy with freemasonry, only conspiracy.
They tried such law in the UK. Guess what: it wasn't approved by the freemason controlled parliament.
If they had only blocked black people does anyone seriously think these people wouldn't already be in prison right now? They criminally prevented Americans exerting their 1st amendment rights so they should be in prison.
Twitter is in California so it would need to be a law authority in California to bring charges unless some of the implicated employees were working from home in different states. That may be an opening. It would be great to see charges brought by a consortium of local sheriffs in front of local judges that would be willing to take on the national intelligence community/social media crime syndicate. This could kick off peaceful separation from the beast.
The US doesn't seem to much care where its laws are broken anywhere in the world even where it has zero jurisdiction as evidenced by the "special rendition flights" so Biden has no excuse he should put out a warrant for his own arrest and everyone else who colluded with him and Obama to do this.
Agree on prosecution of all Feds participating in any role inhibiting non-narrative posts. In the phrase “... possible violation of the First Amendment...” the word “possible” is inappropriate. Deliberate inhibition of free speech by our own government is a very clear violation of our Constitution which includes all amendments. Further, there are many other individuals of our federal gov’t , within agencies and otherwise, guilty of suppressing free speech inconsistent with an official narrative.
First off, all of these social media companies were funded by In-Q-Tel (CIA), created and broken out by they likes of DARPA and DoD, so they are only private to allow for specious justifications.
And don't forget Section 230 which is invalidated if private corps are essentially run by the criminal government agencies like the FBI and CIA.
I disagree. Businesses are subject to law and the law is subject to the Constitution and the Constitution is subject to the Natural Rights I enjoy as a Sovereign Citizen. If the law can be used to compel a Christian baker to bake a cake then it can certainly be used to compel a corporation, particularly ones that purports to be the “new town square”, not to abrogate my God given Rights. (Decidedly NOT my “Constitutional” Rights.)
I’d prefer criminal prosecution of the government employees involved. Given a choice.
Yes it’s 100 percent govt employees. Twitter could do what they want pretty much.
Right? Where’s that poll question?!
Sadly, I think we know the answer to that.
In most cases, I think the censors had a choice: Censor and get paid or, don't censor and you get unemployment along with an IRS audit. Take your pick. The crime was committed by the feds, not with their 'assets'.
As with so much that’s wrong with our situation and “government”, if a small handful push back and stand, they risk a great deal of trouble. But I can’t help but think that if all of us posting our views here and on other alternative resources stood against the government’s obvious unconstitutional laws, actions, EO’s etc, they simply would be powerless to move against all of us. Nullification as the Founders envisioned.
JFK wanted to smash the CIA and FBI into a million pieces. Time to finish the job and do the same to all 5-eyes traitors. Actual traitors to the citizens they purportedly serve.
Everything is a Rich Man's Trick.
https://youtu.be/4oVpt_I9iQQ
You are one step closer to be the 1st smartest guy. It's not the FBI, it's freemasonry. All intelligence agencies were founded by freemasons and are run by freemasons to the core. Even if you change the heads, the body doesn't respond as you have seen with Fauci et al. not obeying the President, but someone higher: their freemason/satanic superior.
Freemasons have to obey like the military, with the difference that their orders are secret and that, if they disobey, they lose their jobs or even their lives, if they reveal any important secret or membership.
So what's really more urgent is a law stating under severe penalty for non-compliance (even to their heirs if that is known after they died), that anyone should disclose if they belong to a secret society, especially those with the requirement to obey secret orders, such as all lodges and freemasonic and luciferian/satanic type of societies.
Penalties should be even more severe with all stake holders involved in or with all the 3 branches of government (even suppliers and candidates), finance (especially, banks, funds, listed corporations) and especially, the armed forces, even the police (that's the reason they' didn't protect the country against blatant constitutional violations).
If this law passes, you'd learn that all listed financial and corporate boards are controlled by freemasons, all the Democrats and especially all the Republicans voting for gender ideology were freemasons, all politicians members of the CFR or attending Sun Valley are freemasons, all dominant media CEOs are freemasons... then people will ask for change, for example, a law barring them from all such positions. There's no deep state just freemasonry. There are no conspiracies, just freemason plots. There's no democracy with freemasonry, only conspiracy.
They tried such law in the UK. Guess what: it wasn't approved by the freemason controlled parliament.
Learn their full plan here:
https://scientificprogress.substack.com/p/the-plan-revealed
If they had only blocked black people does anyone seriously think these people wouldn't already be in prison right now? They criminally prevented Americans exerting their 1st amendment rights so they should be in prison.
Twitter is in California so it would need to be a law authority in California to bring charges unless some of the implicated employees were working from home in different states. That may be an opening. It would be great to see charges brought by a consortium of local sheriffs in front of local judges that would be willing to take on the national intelligence community/social media crime syndicate. This could kick off peaceful separation from the beast.
The US doesn't seem to much care where its laws are broken anywhere in the world even where it has zero jurisdiction as evidenced by the "special rendition flights" so Biden has no excuse he should put out a warrant for his own arrest and everyone else who colluded with him and Obama to do this.
SURPRISE!!!!!!!
Next surprise:
nobody will care come March
Weren't Twitter "employees" following orders?
The real culpability lies with those that were at the top of Twitter and the government agencies.
They are NOT going to prosecute themselves.
So what now?
Can justice be had?
How?
They suppressed the HB lap-top, led to a stolen election and banned many of us (still not back on) and spied on us.
Which law did they brake? On the other hand, we know which law the government was violating - the Constitution! Why emphasize one and not the other?
Go get the bastards. Don't let SLEAZE win.
And who is going to care for what "most Americans support"?
https://rayhorvaththesource.substack.com/p/how-far-can-you-expect-the-globalist
Why will "we" lose and "you," as "I," might prevail:
https://rayhorvaththesource.substack.com/p/what-will-ensure-you-will-lose
<---- one of the most. Raises hand. Along with a whole slew of others that need similar treatment.
Agree on prosecution of all Feds participating in any role inhibiting non-narrative posts. In the phrase “... possible violation of the First Amendment...” the word “possible” is inappropriate. Deliberate inhibition of free speech by our own government is a very clear violation of our Constitution which includes all amendments. Further, there are many other individuals of our federal gov’t , within agencies and otherwise, guilty of suppressing free speech inconsistent with an official narrative.
Most Americans also voted for.Donald.Trump in 2020, how's that working out?
You know Facebook and most Social Media in the US were doing the same.. need indictments to roll for the boys at the top
Very relevant. Thanks for the link.
I would argue that the right to free speech gives me the right to not have my taxpayer money used to block my right to speech, as was done.
First off, all of these social media companies were funded by In-Q-Tel (CIA), created and broken out by they likes of DARPA and DoD, so they are only private to allow for specious justifications.
And don't forget Section 230 which is invalidated if private corps are essentially run by the criminal government agencies like the FBI and CIA.
The are not private companies, they are cover companies for dissemination of State propaganda, tracking, etc.
I disagree. Businesses are subject to law and the law is subject to the Constitution and the Constitution is subject to the Natural Rights I enjoy as a Sovereign Citizen. If the law can be used to compel a Christian baker to bake a cake then it can certainly be used to compel a corporation, particularly ones that purports to be the “new town square”, not to abrogate my God given Rights. (Decidedly NOT my “Constitutional” Rights.)