25 Comments

I’d prefer criminal prosecution of the government employees involved. Given a choice.

Expand full comment

JFK wanted to smash the CIA and FBI into a million pieces. Time to finish the job and do the same to all 5-eyes traitors. Actual traitors to the citizens they purportedly serve.

Everything is a Rich Man's Trick.

https://youtu.be/4oVpt_I9iQQ

Expand full comment

You are one step closer to be the 1st smartest guy. It's not the FBI, it's freemasonry. All intelligence agencies were founded by freemasons and are run by freemasons to the core. Even if you change the heads, the body doesn't respond as you have seen with Fauci et al. not obeying the President, but someone higher: their freemason/satanic superior.

Freemasons have to obey like the military, with the difference that their orders are secret and that, if they disobey, they lose their jobs or even their lives, if they reveal any important secret or membership.

So what's really more urgent is a law stating under severe penalty for non-compliance (even to their heirs if that is known after they died), that anyone should disclose if they belong to a secret society, especially those with the requirement to obey secret orders, such as all lodges and freemasonic and luciferian/satanic type of societies.

Penalties should be even more severe with all stake holders involved in or with all the 3 branches of government (even suppliers and candidates), finance (especially, banks, funds, listed corporations) and especially, the armed forces, even the police (that's the reason they' didn't protect the country against blatant constitutional violations).

If this law passes, you'd learn that all listed financial and corporate boards are controlled by freemasons, all the Democrats and especially all the Republicans voting for gender ideology were freemasons, all politicians members of the CFR or attending Sun Valley are freemasons, all dominant media CEOs are freemasons... then people will ask for change, for example, a law barring them from all such positions. There's no deep state just freemasonry. There are no conspiracies, just freemason plots. There's no democracy with freemasonry, only conspiracy.

They tried such law in the UK. Guess what: it wasn't approved by the freemason controlled parliament.

Learn their full plan here:

https://scientificprogress.substack.com/p/the-plan-revealed

Expand full comment

If they had only blocked black people does anyone seriously think these people wouldn't already be in prison right now? They criminally prevented Americans exerting their 1st amendment rights so they should be in prison.

Expand full comment

Twitter is in California so it would need to be a law authority in California to bring charges unless some of the implicated employees were working from home in different states. That may be an opening. It would be great to see charges brought by a consortium of local sheriffs in front of local judges that would be willing to take on the national intelligence community/social media crime syndicate. This could kick off peaceful separation from the beast.

Expand full comment

SURPRISE!!!!!!!

Next surprise:

nobody will care come March

Expand full comment

Weren't Twitter "employees" following orders?

The real culpability lies with those that were at the top of Twitter and the government agencies.

They are NOT going to prosecute themselves.

So what now?

Can justice be had?

How?

They suppressed the HB lap-top, led to a stolen election and banned many of us (still not back on) and spied on us.

Expand full comment

Which law did they brake? On the other hand, we know which law the government was violating - the Constitution! Why emphasize one and not the other?

Expand full comment

Go get the bastards. Don't let SLEAZE win.

Expand full comment

<---- one of the most. Raises hand. Along with a whole slew of others that need similar treatment.

Expand full comment

Agree on prosecution of all Feds participating in any role inhibiting non-narrative posts. In the phrase “... possible violation of the First Amendment...” the word “possible” is inappropriate. Deliberate inhibition of free speech by our own government is a very clear violation of our Constitution which includes all amendments. Further, there are many other individuals of our federal gov’t , within agencies and otherwise, guilty of suppressing free speech inconsistent with an official narrative.

Expand full comment

Most Americans also voted for.Donald.Trump in 2020, how's that working out?

Expand full comment

You know Facebook and most Social Media in the US were doing the same.. need indictments to roll for the boys at the top

Expand full comment
Removed (Banned)Dec 30, 2022
Comment removed
Expand full comment
Comment deleted
Expand full comment