EXPOSED: Bill Gates’s Relationship with Convicted Pedophile Jeffrey Epstein Revolved Around a Global Health Investment Fund
And how this relates to The WHO Pandemic Treaty and Amendments to the International Health Regulations: Enabling a Global Health Dictatorship
Pedophilia, eugenics and banking go hand in hand in hand for the dark forces that created their sociopathic frontman puppet Bill Gates.
The below pair of articles are anything but unrelated.
Earlier this month, I revealed that one of Bill Gates’s most powerful business partners, JPMorgan Chase, had reached a combined $365 million settlement with Jeffrey Epstein’s victims and the U.S. Virgin Islands, which a federal judge approved on November 9.
My new book Controligarchs: Exposing the Billionaire Class, Their Secret Deals, and the Globalist Plot to Dominate Your Life digs deeper into Gates’s partnership with JPMorgan and how it led to Gates’s relationship with Epstein via a top JPMorgan executive named James E. “Jes” Staley.
In this photograph obtained by the New York Times of a gathering at Jeffrey Epstein’s Manhattan mansion in 2011, the following individuals are seen (from left to right): James E. Staley, who was a senior JPMorgan executive in 2011; former Treasury Secretary Lawrence Summers; Jeffrey Epstein; Microsoft Co-founder Bill Gates; and Boris Nikolic, who was a science adviser for the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation. (New York Times)
Over time, Gates and JPMorgan established an investment fund that sought to profit from the development of vaccines and other health technologies. Epstein wanted a piece of the action, and Staley brought Epstein into the Gates partnership.
The Gates-JPMorgan partnership was called the Global Health Investment Fund (GHIF) and was created circa 2011. At the time, Staley managed the Epstein relationship for the bank, and Epstein was a valuable client who brought JPMorgan a lot of business. Epstein was an adviser to billionaires like Victoria’s Secret mogul Leslie Wexner and Wall Street legend Leon Black and the “family offices” which manage their fortunes. Wexner and Black deny any involvement in Epstein’s criminal activities.
James “Jes” Staley is interviewed on Bloomberg Television during the World Economic Forum (WEF) in Davos, Switzerland, on Jan. 25, 2018. (Simon Dawson/Bloomberg via Getty Images)
The GHIF partnership brought in a host of other powerful investors, including The Pfizer Foundation, Merck, GlaxoSmithKline, as well as entities funded by the governments of Sweden, Canada, and Germany. There would also be private support from “qualified individuals and family offices.”
The GHIF’s purpose was to give “individual and institutional investors the opportunity to finance late-stage global health technologies that have the potential to save millions of lives in low-income countries.” The Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation and the Swedish International Development Cooperation Agency committed to help offset any potential GHIF losses.
As the GHIF was getting started, Epstein began pitching other business ideas to Gates and his foundation staff. They met “many times,” according to the New York Times, and Gates flew on Epstein’s Gulfstream plane from Teterboro Airport in New Jersey to Palm Beach, Florida, according to a March 2013 flight manifest.
It turned out that Gates and Epstein had mutual interests in the areas of global health and funding scientific breakthroughs. Both men also had a deep interest in genetic tinkering projects. Epstein reportedly wanted to “seed the human race” with his own DNA by impregnating scores of women. Ironically (or perhaps hypocritically), Epstein was concerned about overpopulation.
Billionaire Jeffrey Epstein is seen in this photo taken in Cambridge, Massachusetts, on Sept. 8, 2004. (Rick Friedman/Rick Friedman Photography/Corbis via Getty Images)
Likewise, Gates has long been worried about overpopulation and has stated repeatedly that he wants to mass vaccinate the third world, specifically for the purpose of curbing population growth. In a 2010 TED Talk, Gates succinctly explained his rationale for funding vaccines and birth control to curtail population growth worldwide.
“The world today has 6.8 billion people. That’s headed up to about 9 billion,” Gates warned. “Now, if we do a really great job on new vaccines, health care, reproductive health services, we could lower that by, perhaps, ten or fifteen percent.”
But Epstein worried that saving lives by curing diseases would not lower population growth rates. He “criticized efforts to reduce starvation and provide health care to the poor because doing so increased the risk of overpopulation,” the New York Times reported. Bill and Melinda Gates apparently do not see curing diseases in the same way.
Bill Gates (left) and his wife Melinda hold a press conference in New York on December 2, 1998, to announce a $100 million gift to establish the Bill and Melinda Gates Children’s Vaccine Program. (TIMOTHY A. CLARY/Getty Images)
Bill Gates speaks to world leaders about global vaccine immunization push at a conference in London on June 13, 2016. (Paul Hackett/In Pictures via Getty Images Images)
Bill Gates holds up a vaccine during a press conference at the World Health Organization (WHO) assembly to make a push for vaccine programs on May 17, 2011, in Geneva, Switzerland. (FABRICE COFFRINI/AFP via Getty Images)
Melinda Gates and Bill Gates speak about the COVID-19 pandemic during the “One World: Together At Home” broadcast by Global Citizen on April, 18, 2020, to support the World Health Organization (WHO). (Getty Images)
While Melinda has acknowledged that saving lives to reduce population may seem counterintuitive, it is not how she views the issue. “When more children live past the age of five,” she said in a 2018 interview, “population sizes don’t go up, they go down.”
Crucial to this formula are the population control efforts into which Bill and Melinda Gates and their foundation pour billions of dollars: contraceptives, pills, and abortion (or, as Melinda describes it, allowing mothers to “decide if and when to have children”).
The simple formula for Gates’s plan to save the world appeared to be the following: vaccines plus abortion plus birth control equals sustainability. As Controligarchs reveals, it just so happens that Bill Gates and his associates profit from both sides of this equation.
After JPMorgan and Gates teamed up on the global health fund, Epstein pitched an idea for a separate partnership, envisioning “a vast fund, seeded with the Gates Foundation’s money, that would focus on health projects around the world,” the New York Times reported.
However, any future plans involving Epstein were scrapped once he was charged with sex trafficking minors in July 2019. Naturally, his friends and associates began distancing themselves from him, and Melinda Gates claims that she divorced Bill in 2021 due to his relationship with Epstein. Bill Gates has denied having any involvement in Epstein’s crimes.
Epstein reportedly hung himself in his prison cell under mysterious circumstances in August 2019.
The GHIF continued its work after the Gates-JPMorgan-Epstein connections were exposed. It had backed mRNA technologies at least five years before the COVID-19 pandemic, and at least four of the companies that the GHIF invested in—Atomo Diagnostics, AccessBio, GeneDrive, and Univercells—“actively worked to address the COVID-19 pandemic through efficient diagnostics that help identify and track cases and the application of innovative technologies for vaccine development and manufacturing.”
The simple formula for Gates’s handlers is to decarbonize = depopulate the majority of humanity, and pollute all of the animals and plants with Modified mRNA and DNA bio-contamination. In the meantime, the global financial sector with the likes of JP Morgan and their technocommunist central banks will detonate their stock and bond markets to usher in both UBI and their CBDC which ports into their AI-driven social credit score system. At that point bug gruel, Amazon shopping, and trickles of digital welfare handouts will be predicated on never-ending slow kill bioweapon boosters, and bug gruel CO2 credits, etc. & etc.
To that end “Bill Gates” selected fellow genocidal Marxist maniac puppet Tedros to lead the UN’s global eugenics “health” node in the WHO in order to lockdown the planet forever under the guises of their various “pandemic” and “climate change” psyops. Or what the dystopian and democidal endgames for 2030 Agenda and The Great Reset are supposed to look like.
Which brings us to the army of Gates and CCP-funded UN mercenary invaders in WHO uniforms standing by to completely upend the last vestiges of Constitutions and human rights…
The WHO Pandemic Treaty and Amendments to the International Health Regulations: Enabling a Global Health Dictatorship
Intended to form part of international law, preparations for the creation of a World Health Organization (WHO) pandemic treaty began in 2001. Far from strengthening the prevention of, preparedness for, and response to future pandemics as the latest draft of the text claims, its implementation could severely undermine democracy by limiting the ability of national parliaments to make crucial healthcare decisions in the best interests of their citizens. Aided by proposed amendments to the International Health Regulations of 2005, the treaty threatens to transform the WHO into a global health dictatorship.
The sweeping influence exerted by the WHO during the COVID-19 pandemic was the result of revised International Health Regulations passed at a meeting of the World Health Assembly (WHA) in 2005. The decision-making body of the WHO, the WHA’s meetings are held annually in Geneva, Switzerland, and attended by delegations from the WHO’s 194 Member States.
Prior to 2005, the WHO had principally acted as a coordinator, assistant, or collaborator to the public health services and drug regulatory authorities of its Member States. But with the passing of the revised International Health Regulations, the WHO took on vast new powers that were unprecedented in the field of global health. These essentially enable it to decide when a public health emergency of international concern exists and to take key decisions regarding what measures should be implemented in response. Under the regulations, the WHO’s recommended actions can include vaccination, quarantine, isolation, drug treatment, and contact tracing, among others.
Now, however, in the wake of the COVID-19 pandemic, the road is being prepared for the WHO’s already considerable powers to be expanded still further. Particularly worryingly, the latest draft of the proposed amendments to the regulations shows that clauses that previously made their provisions non-binding are being reworded – effectively making them mandatory and giving the WHO real decision-making powers over its Member States. As such, claims that the planned pandemic treaty will not undermine national sovereignty are at best disingenuous, as its text has to be viewed in light of the increased authority that, if approved, will be given to the WHO under the amended International Health Regulations.
The WHO thinks you have “too much information”
The growing concern over the WHO pandemic treaty isn’t simply that it could undermine democracy by preventing national parliaments from being able to make crucial healthcare decisions in the best interests of their citizens. Through introducing the term “infodemic,” the treaty seems to be attempting to prevent the spread of truthful information about science-based natural health approaches and dangerous experimental vaccines. Without citing any evidence, the text claims that having “too much information” available during a disease outbreak causes “confusion and risk-taking behaviors that can harm health.” Suggesting who this wording is primarily intended to benefit – namely, the WHO itself – the text states that having too much information apparently “leads to mistrust in health authorities.” To counter this, “infodemic management, at local, national, regional and international levels,” is proposed.
The pandemic treaty also dramatically expands the WHO’s areas of interest. Through what it terms a “One Health approach,” the global body now intends to be able to take decisions in health matters related to animals, ecosystems, and the environment. The treaty specifically refers to “taking action on climate change,” for example. Several observers have suggested that with these extended powers, the WHO could potentially declare an environmental or climate emergency and enforce lockdowns.
Given the global body’s close links to Bill Gates and the pharma industry, and the hundreds of millions of dollars in annual funding it receives from them, there is a growing worldwide recognition that this looming power grab represents a fundamental threat to democracy . At the very least, the increasing transfer of powers to the WHO raises important questions regarding national sovereignty and personal liberty.
Ultimately, if its handling of the COVID-19 pandemic has taught us anything, it is that the WHO has sold its soul to corporate interests and cannot be trusted to take important decisions on global health. It is surely in all of our interests to demand that our national lawmakers do not sign away the sovereignty that the WHO is seeking.
One Health Approach = One Global Currency = One World Government
VACCINES KILL LIVES
They want you dead.
Do NOT comply.