“In the first 15 minutes following injection of the Pfizer jab, researchers found that the total lipid concentration in the ovaries measured 0.104ml. This then increased to 1.34ml after 1 hour, 2.34ml after 4 hours, and then 12.3ml after 48 hours.”
This is not quite correct. Those numbers are not ml but micrograms per gram (or ml, as appropriate) of tissue.
It doesn’t really change the conclusion as far as I can see (the point being increasing concentration), but the error detracts from the work.
This is a compelling article, thank you. Two quick comments …
- dramatic decline in birth rates is something showing up in recent data, “unexplainable” drops in Taiwan and Sweden to name only two. This is useful proof of depopulation agenda success
- ovarian cancer graph only shows delayed diagnosis due to lockdown … I only eyeballed this but I think absolute numbers would show that very specifically if you have access to them. In my view, this graph is not helpful to your case, easily-dismissed. One easily dismissed thing serves to undercut stronger evidence
doesnt anyone go to fauci and gates to show them these figure ???
people around them are Yes man and dont tell them the truth ... gauci is sort in a bubble, doesnt seem to be with other people at all, just interviews in front of those two flags as an alien figure from some other planet ...
It takes 9 months for a pregnancy to have a successful outcome. Known outcomes within 9 months tend to be bad. For example almost 100% of spontaneous abortions occur within the first 20 weeks. Pfizers report included data less than 3 months after vaccines were rolled out. Its not surprising there were a large number of unknown outcomes of the reported events. Since we have no idea of the denominator (how many pregnant women were injected), the data offers little but as a distraction, which may be why they release the same report over and over again starting from December 2021
It takes 9 months for a pregnancy to have a successful outcome. Known outcomes much less than 9 months tend to be bad. For example almost 100% of spontaneous abortions occur within the first 20 weeks. Pfizers report included data less than 3 months after vaccines were rolled out. Its not surprising there were a large number of unknown outcomes of the reported events. Since we have no idea of the denominator (how many pregnant women were injected), the data offers little but as a distraction, which may be why they release the same report over and over again starting from December 2021
127. "[I'M] FATHER TO A MURDERED SON, HUSBAND TO A MURDERED WIFE, AND I WILL HAVE MY VENGEANCE IN THIS LIFE OR THE NEXT." --Maximus. The cult wants to kill our unborn grandchildren along with the rest of us, and the numbers prove it.
The 1,500%+ increase might be accurate, but feels misleading comparing .25 per million to 2 per million. All of the evidence is compelling without this graph. This one feels like fear mongering. Thanks for this important piece
No. Reporting to VAERS is inconvenient and most HCW's don't understand how to use it. They are mandated reporters for all events in temporal association with administration of EUA products, but most people think the vaccines are safe, so they don't report things because they think reporting implies causality, which it does not, but not reporting does distort perceptions of safety. Also the CDC/HHS/FDA was supposed to do regular safety assessments and reports as part of the EUA process and they have done zero. Why?
“In the first 15 minutes following injection of the Pfizer jab, researchers found that the total lipid concentration in the ovaries measured 0.104ml. This then increased to 1.34ml after 1 hour, 2.34ml after 4 hours, and then 12.3ml after 48 hours.”
This is not quite correct. Those numbers are not ml but micrograms per gram (or ml, as appropriate) of tissue.
It doesn’t really change the conclusion as far as I can see (the point being increasing concentration), but the error detracts from the work.
it provides covers for fact checkers - not to discuss substance but talk about this ... it makes you wonder if it was done intentionally ....
So when will we start hanging people?
merkola has a great interview ... for only a couple of days though ...
https://articles.mercola.com/sites/articles/archive/2022/07/10/global-depopulation-agenda.aspx?ui=1af24b813f25a6206f1915e188a6a5d1d0c4bba905d78a33a9d988a9366a57ab&sd=20211012&cid_source=dnl&cid_medium=email&cid_content=art1ReadMore&cid=20220710_HL2&mid=DM1204390&rid=1543782746
the vidoes are up indefinitely on his bitchute: https://www.bitchute.com/video/NLDbOU02hUyj/
these are up indefinitely on any audio platform such as Apple Podcasts.
This is a compelling article, thank you. Two quick comments …
- dramatic decline in birth rates is something showing up in recent data, “unexplainable” drops in Taiwan and Sweden to name only two. This is useful proof of depopulation agenda success
- ovarian cancer graph only shows delayed diagnosis due to lockdown … I only eyeballed this but I think absolute numbers would show that very specifically if you have access to them. In my view, this graph is not helpful to your case, easily-dismissed. One easily dismissed thing serves to undercut stronger evidence
doesnt anyone go to fauci and gates to show them these figure ???
people around them are Yes man and dont tell them the truth ... gauci is sort in a bubble, doesnt seem to be with other people at all, just interviews in front of those two flags as an alien figure from some other planet ...
They know. They are not willing for such unfortunate facts to get in the way of a larger objective
Of course, this was their goal from the beginning.
Precisely
It takes 9 months for a pregnancy to have a successful outcome. Known outcomes within 9 months tend to be bad. For example almost 100% of spontaneous abortions occur within the first 20 weeks. Pfizers report included data less than 3 months after vaccines were rolled out. Its not surprising there were a large number of unknown outcomes of the reported events. Since we have no idea of the denominator (how many pregnant women were injected), the data offers little but as a distraction, which may be why they release the same report over and over again starting from December 2021
It takes 9 months for a pregnancy to have a successful outcome. Known outcomes much less than 9 months tend to be bad. For example almost 100% of spontaneous abortions occur within the first 20 weeks. Pfizers report included data less than 3 months after vaccines were rolled out. Its not surprising there were a large number of unknown outcomes of the reported events. Since we have no idea of the denominator (how many pregnant women were injected), the data offers little but as a distraction, which may be why they release the same report over and over again starting from December 2021
Whoever you are, I follow you like the Deadheads followed the Grateful Dead. Your post is well documented, but I put the problems in more dramatic terms: https://robertyoho.substack.com/p/127-im-father-to-a-murdered-son-husband#details
127. "[I'M] FATHER TO A MURDERED SON, HUSBAND TO A MURDERED WIFE, AND I WILL HAVE MY VENGEANCE IN THIS LIFE OR THE NEXT." --Maximus. The cult wants to kill our unborn grandchildren along with the rest of us, and the numbers prove it.
Remember big scama quit animals trials with MRNA tech cause all the animals died!
The 1,500%+ increase might be accurate, but feels misleading comparing .25 per million to 2 per million. All of the evidence is compelling without this graph. This one feels like fear mongering. Thanks for this important piece
Please correct me if I'm wrong, but aren't the VAERS statistically reported adverse events most likely much higher than the actual reported figures?
No. Reporting to VAERS is inconvenient and most HCW's don't understand how to use it. They are mandated reporters for all events in temporal association with administration of EUA products, but most people think the vaccines are safe, so they don't report things because they think reporting implies causality, which it does not, but not reporting does distort perceptions of safety. Also the CDC/HHS/FDA was supposed to do regular safety assessments and reports as part of the EUA process and they have done zero. Why?
Thank you. That was my basic understanding.