12 Comments
May 20, 2022Liked by 2nd Smartest Guy in the World

My sister and brother-in-law were visiting this week. I tried to tell them about this type of information and they got angry and didn't want to continue the conversation. My BIL told me I was crazy. Whenever I try to inform her about this stuff, my sister says, "I think this conversation is going someplace I don't want to go." I try to send her informative articles and she replies with "NO POLITICS!" They refuse to accept anything other than the MSM narrative. It's quite frustrating. I'm simply trying to give them a broader context and additional information upon which they can make decisions.

Expand full comment
author

Death Cultists lash out at any information that runs counter to their reality inversion programming.

Expand full comment
May 20, 2022Liked by 2nd Smartest Guy in the World

It's sad because, at least in this case, they are really nice people.

Expand full comment
author

Lots of the Jonestown cultists were very nice people.

Expand full comment

I tried to speak to my brother back when these spikeshots first came out and he hadn't gotten one yet. He was polite but didn't want to hear me. I sent him lots of information which I am absolutely sure he never looked at. This November, just before Thanksgiving, we buried him, and I am close to 100% sure it was due to the shots, based on his previous good health and the constellation of problems that tracked with the well-established adverse events from these poisonous injections. We do what we can, but for some, there is no breaking through. It really is a cult.

Expand full comment

Martha, I am so very sorry about your loss. My heart goes out to you and your family. Unfortunately, the cognitive dissonance is massive, thanks to the brainwashing of the 'nudge units' using applied applied psychology and purposefully planting the fear porn promulgated by governments and mockingbird media worldwide.

Expand full comment
May 20, 2022Liked by 2nd Smartest Guy in the World

My conclusion is that the data shows that harming children is intentional. No manufacturer or “health agency “ would allow these products to be brought to market with these results.

Expand full comment

The great reckoning is coming. A special place in hell awaits those who have in any way contributed to the murder of these precious children for no reason. Well I guess once we dispense with the fact that children with healthy immune systems were never in any danger of dying from Covid-19, we are left with the obvious - that the "experimental" injection of children with these bioweapons is part of a real depopulation agenda. While the experts are still playing catch-up, the more we get to know about the effects on various populations, the more diabolical and evil this is. With the growing amount of literature and warnings available, I am at a loss to know whether ignorance can be used as a defence.

Expand full comment

Trying to follow….Your math in the 10-14 year old all cause death example showed 6.1 and then you said it was 4.58 deaths per 100,000. Can you please make that more understandable?

Expand full comment

I'm no math expert, either, but that's simple math and I don't see any way to get from 6.1 to 4.58 using the data immediately above the section. So I suspect it's a typo. But if it is, that's a significant problem when presenting the article to others because someone who would make such a significant typographical error on an issue this serious can easily be questioned as to their degree of attention to detail. As such, while I understand what he's attempting to show and the data seems to support it, I can't share the article as written until further explanation is provided or the typo (if that's what it is) is corrected.

Expand full comment
May 20, 2022·edited May 20, 2022

Yes, that confused me, too. I had some trouble understanding a lot of this Exposé article (not the first time I've found their math and graphs opaque). As someone pretty hopeless with math, I'd appreciate some extra help.

Expand full comment

Table 6, not table 9.

Expand full comment