BOMBSHELL: 4 DEATHVAX™ Servings = "Overt Reduction of the Overall Immune Responses" = VAIDS = Mortality
A landmark Chinese research study found that mice injected with four DEATHVAX™ servings experienced an extreme negative immune response.
In the current study, we found that a subsequent fourth administration of the same vaccine continued to stimulate the production of RBD-specific neutralizing antibodies, whose serum levels were sustained for at least 6 weeks. These findings were in accordance with the reported neutralizing effect of the fourth dose of the Pfizer vaccine on the SARS-CoV-2 mutants (Tanne, 2022). However, when we administrated additional doses of the same vaccine booster, with the attempt to induce a similarly enhanced or at least sustained immune response, we observed an overt reduction of the overall immune responses.
As this substack has previously observed, the dose determines the poison. Negative efficacy develops into the decimation of natural immunity.
Both the titer of RBD-specific antibodies and the serum neutralizing potency against SARS-CoV-2 pseudo-viruses were severely impacted, with more than two folds decrease in the IC50 against the most recently emerged SARS-CoV-2 variants, including the Delta and Omicron mutants. This suggests that repetitive administration of RBD booster vaccines may actively promote humoral immune tolerance, instead of functional humoral immunity.
In other words, the slow kill bioweapon is exceedingly effective at unsafe:
The evidenced immune tolerance from repetitive dosing with homologous boosters in our study suggests that caution should be exercised when optimizing the extended plan for SARS-CoV-2 booster vaccination. Instead of continuous dosing with homologous prime vaccines, a mid-way switch to heterologous booster choices may offer a chance of improvement to the observed energy against Omicron mutants (Reynolds et al., 2022).
Of course, the researchers are still pushing for more deadly junk science in the form of continued “vaccinations” incorporating alternative needless booster formulations.
This substack coined the term “slow kill bioweapon” precisely because of the variable nature of the eugenics program:
Moreover, over-vaccination may generate an immunosuppression micro-environment that is also an important facilitator of immune tolerance. We demonstrated that both the percentage of CD25+Foxp3+CD4+ Treg cells and the levels of immunosuppression cytokines IL-10 were up-regulated after extended RBD vaccine booster vaccination.
Some die instantly, but most take anywhere from 2 to 5 years to succumb as function of reinforcing and worsening their VAIDS via never-ending boosters.
And the horrifying reveal is conveniently provided in the last sentence of the research study:
Collectively, these results suggest that cautions are needed with repetitive SARS-CoV-2 booster vaccination in massive scale population.
In other words, massive scale population reduction.
We can be absolutely certain that when Moderna patented their gain-of-function furin cleavage site SARS-CoV-2 “vaccine” years before their “novel coronavirus” “pandemic” was rolled out, all of the above was known to these bioterror perpetrators.
Remember, Moderna was a “struggling” startup for over a decade, and was on the DoD, CIA and NIH payrolls well before they were allowed to finally secure their patent. Four years later, Moderna and Pfizer develop their “overnight” Operation Warp Speed Modified mRNA “vaccines”mere months into their globally coordinated PSYOP-19 democide scam.
Do NOT comply.
Yep. I’ve also read analyses (by brilliant Substackers) of studies that imply even some who only took the first round could be seriously impaired, but this might not manifest as apparent for a decade or more.
By the way, my husband LOVES the Do Not Comply hat I purchased from you. He has worn it to work everyday since it arrived! 😂😂😂
As far as I understand it, that study used partial spike protein which was injected in some known quantity. Some people were trying to minimize the importance of the results by claiming that "it wasn't mRNA anyways;" however, imagine how much worse it would be for mRNA!
The mRNA distributes all over the body, hijacks cells which are destroyed for bonus organ damage, and then produces an unknown quantity of full spike for an unknown length of time deep inside the body!
So where this study had immune system issues manifesting after 4, 5, 6 shots, we might hazard a guess that the mRNA would be much more destructive with fewer shots due to the mass quantity of spike potentially produced.
And that doesn't even get into the lipid nanoparticle toxicity, the partial mRNA producing random proteins or any of the other follow on effects of spike protein accumulation.
EDIT: Oh and I forgot the persistence of mRNA spike is far higher due to the pseudo uridine replacements. So it lasts longer, does damage longer, etc.