BigPharma & the Death Cultists have Won: Ivermectin does **NOT** Reduce Risk of COVID-19 Hospitalization, New Clinical Study Shows, so Please Rush Out and Get Another DEATHVAX™ Booster
BigPharma & the Death Cultists have Won: Ivermectin does **NOT** Reduce Risk of COVID-19 Hospitalization, New Clinical Study Shows, so Please Rush Out and Get Another DEATHVAX™ Booster
Forget Uttar Pradesh’s irrefutable Ivermectin success story with near zero covid deaths. Forget the dozens upon dozens of high quality research studies establishing Ivermectin’s exceptional reduction of hospitalizations and mortality. Forget about science and data too, because yesterday the Death Cultists have defeated all of the horse pill popping antivaxxers, racists, climate change deniers, and domestic terrorists in one fell research study swoop.
This is standard operating procedure of big pharma. They attack vitamin D regularly with studies designed to fail. The headline reads “Vitamin D has no effect on heart disease”, for example, only to find that the stooges who ran the study used a dose too low to have any effect.
You don’t even have to take anything other than water and some Tylenol to bring down crazy fevers and symptoms of covid. It’s really just the Fkn cold/flu.
This isn't even mentioning the fact that it's a supposed "early treatment" but they don't allow you in the study unless you've shown symptoms for more than 7 days. At that point, the virus is mostly dead and the thing putting you in the hospital is sepsis and oxidative stress. Garbage study all around.
Apr 1, 2022·edited Apr 1, 2022Liked by 2nd Smartest Guy in the World
I briefly reviewed the study and the procedure section described administering ivermectin after the patients were ill yet did not specify the duration of the illness. In addition, it was administered for a period of only four days. Four days! Nuff said.
Alex Berenson’s stack offered the study as conclusive proof that ivermectin failed to ameliorate covid symptoms. Any ideas on his slant? Limited hangout? But they usually choose cordial folks???
"Note that by choosing not to identify vaccination status as a confounding variable the authors are implying that vaccines are playing no role in preventing hospitalization."
Love your breakdown. The booster doesn't work. They don't even say it does. Just to use it anyway. "This shampoo robs your hair of body...but please use it anyway." (quote from my favorite 80s movie)
You know there is an old saying, "Garbage in, garbage out."
But these guys take perfectly good data and get "garbage out."
Well, it 's not "garbage," but "propaganda."
And once they get the Headlines from a complicit media, the rest of the "Study" can go in the trash. Then "circular reasoning" can take place, they can pass "legislation" or "emergency" rules with the Headline which they themselves generated and implanted into the complicit media. This is what the FBI/CIA did with the "Russian Collusion."
Or Charlottesville. Or -insert blank here-.
Remember, early in the Italian Covid "outbreak" how they discovered through the generally good medical records the Italian's keep on their citizens, that the 30,000 hydroxyquinone patients being treated for Lupus, or RA (rheumatoid arthritis) showed only 20 positive cases with no hospitalizations and ZERO deaths.
Also early in the "outbreak" we had multiple deaths in nursing homes initially. And from the symptoms of the patients dying, we figured the emphysema and COPD and various other lung ailments/injuries/cancer patients would be toast. But almost none of these patients died. Most didn't even get particularly sick. Obviously, since this group has co-morbidities equivalent to or worse than the rest of the population in the facility, it should have been simple to determine why they were surviving. What did they take that generally the rest of the individuals didn't, well it is obvious isn't it, steroid inhalers!
They never really did come out and say it, did they?
On top of all you mention, the case death rate, both sides, was in the 3% range. That's way above anything we're seeing worldwide for this period unless I'm mistaken. Something was really wrong with how they treated these patients because this is worse than we would expect even with serious underlying conditions as all these people had. Even so, using Pharma's bullsh*t calculation of relative risk reduction instead of absolute, the ivermectin group had a 12.5% reduction in deaths over the placebo group. Reminds me of the Tuskegee Airman movie. "You invite us to a poker game. Hand us a fixed deck. And then wonder why we can't win." Designed to fail study. People still dying with the possibility, hopefully remote, that this virus will mutate into something more dangerous. And they call us crazy.
Perhaps because I am unvaxxed and not obese, I just can't seem to catch Covid, but if I do, I am going with the deadly and ineffective Hydroxychloroquine.
Here is Matthew Crawford along with science journalist Charles Platt re-examining studies and demonstrating clear efficacy for HCQ: https://youtu.be/90h_re5CrMQ
Probably to save his career, Platt has asked the interview to be taken down, so today is its last day.
This is standard operating procedure of big pharma. They attack vitamin D regularly with studies designed to fail. The headline reads “Vitamin D has no effect on heart disease”, for example, only to find that the stooges who ran the study used a dose too low to have any effect.
You don’t even have to take anything other than water and some Tylenol to bring down crazy fevers and symptoms of covid. It’s really just the Fkn cold/flu.
Big Science is evil!
Trust everything you read in the NEJM.
https://www.nejm.org/doi/full/10.1056/NEJMe068054
And a former editor-in-chief on the esteemed publication:
https://judahstclinic.com/news/2013/12/14/nejm-editor-no-longer-possible-to-believe-much-of-clinical-research-published
This isn't even mentioning the fact that it's a supposed "early treatment" but they don't allow you in the study unless you've shown symptoms for more than 7 days. At that point, the virus is mostly dead and the thing putting you in the hospital is sepsis and oxidative stress. Garbage study all around.
I briefly reviewed the study and the procedure section described administering ivermectin after the patients were ill yet did not specify the duration of the illness. In addition, it was administered for a period of only four days. Four days! Nuff said.
Alex Berenson’s stack offered the study as conclusive proof that ivermectin failed to ameliorate covid symptoms. Any ideas on his slant? Limited hangout? But they usually choose cordial folks???
"Note that by choosing not to identify vaccination status as a confounding variable the authors are implying that vaccines are playing no role in preventing hospitalization."
Great observation!
Love your breakdown. The booster doesn't work. They don't even say it does. Just to use it anyway. "This shampoo robs your hair of body...but please use it anyway." (quote from my favorite 80s movie)
You know there is an old saying, "Garbage in, garbage out."
But these guys take perfectly good data and get "garbage out."
Well, it 's not "garbage," but "propaganda."
And once they get the Headlines from a complicit media, the rest of the "Study" can go in the trash. Then "circular reasoning" can take place, they can pass "legislation" or "emergency" rules with the Headline which they themselves generated and implanted into the complicit media. This is what the FBI/CIA did with the "Russian Collusion."
Or Charlottesville. Or -insert blank here-.
Remember, early in the Italian Covid "outbreak" how they discovered through the generally good medical records the Italian's keep on their citizens, that the 30,000 hydroxyquinone patients being treated for Lupus, or RA (rheumatoid arthritis) showed only 20 positive cases with no hospitalizations and ZERO deaths.
Also early in the "outbreak" we had multiple deaths in nursing homes initially. And from the symptoms of the patients dying, we figured the emphysema and COPD and various other lung ailments/injuries/cancer patients would be toast. But almost none of these patients died. Most didn't even get particularly sick. Obviously, since this group has co-morbidities equivalent to or worse than the rest of the population in the facility, it should have been simple to determine why they were surviving. What did they take that generally the rest of the individuals didn't, well it is obvious isn't it, steroid inhalers!
They never really did come out and say it, did they?
On top of all you mention, the case death rate, both sides, was in the 3% range. That's way above anything we're seeing worldwide for this period unless I'm mistaken. Something was really wrong with how they treated these patients because this is worse than we would expect even with serious underlying conditions as all these people had. Even so, using Pharma's bullsh*t calculation of relative risk reduction instead of absolute, the ivermectin group had a 12.5% reduction in deaths over the placebo group. Reminds me of the Tuskegee Airman movie. "You invite us to a poker game. Hand us a fixed deck. And then wonder why we can't win." Designed to fail study. People still dying with the possibility, hopefully remote, that this virus will mutate into something more dangerous. And they call us crazy.
Perhaps because I am unvaxxed and not obese, I just can't seem to catch Covid, but if I do, I am going with the deadly and ineffective Hydroxychloroquine.
Here is Matthew Crawford along with science journalist Charles Platt re-examining studies and demonstrating clear efficacy for HCQ: https://youtu.be/90h_re5CrMQ
Probably to save his career, Platt has asked the interview to be taken down, so today is its last day.
Hey2SG, stupid is as stupid does. You cannot reason with rocks.
https://participatorymedicine.org/epatients/2012/03/former-nejm-editors-on-the-corruption-of-american-medicine-ny-times.html
https://annecantstandit.substack.com/p/booster-boosters?r=1ec82g&s=r&utm_campaign=post&utm_medium=web
Love the visual from Anne can't stand it
Love
Boos for the boosters
Let the roosters crow
We know we know we know
Fauce's got to go
Our love's got to grow
Our freedom we now sow
Dr Ding-Bat was trained by those Pfucks so its not really a shock
Just in time for the '6th wave"........