6 Comments
User's avatar
RandiG's avatar

The more I read your writing, the more knowledgeable I become, but the more scared I am, as well. My husband had a tetanus shot two months ago after cutting his hand. Had I known that you need the shot 3-8 weeks earlier for it o be effective, I would have stopped him.

Thank you for all the work you share with us. It really means a lot and makes a difference!

Margaret Golden's avatar

Thank you so much for sharing your wisdom! Your comprehensive article should be a required read for all parents.. actually in all honesty there is no reason why kids in high school are not taught this in their health class. All of these shots are being required of these kids at all different ages and they have a right to say no… look at what was done to the kids going into college during Covid. We all know that was a horrific mandate and yet these kids wanted to go to school ….They were between a rock and a hard place and they had to sacrifice their body ….why?…because someone in academia made the decision that students couldn’t have an education without a Covid shot…just writing that sounds absurd …..but that’s what we lived thru…wait.. we are still seeing the shot commercials… Fall is here folks, better run and get your mrna flu shot, pneumonia shot, or how about that new moderna covid shot… yeah that’s the ticket.. then you will never get sick…

LAE's avatar

Excellent deep dive. Much appreciated!

Thomas A Braun RPh's avatar

Senator Thomas Massie figured out how to get Epstein files released which became a token amount. It was a mistake that cost him his re-election bid. The deep state who ever they are spent $30 million attacking his character with TV ads. Listened to him speak on the subject at the Polyface Farm event this last weekend in Swoope Va. Sponsored by the Brownstone Institute! I bet if the truth was known DC would be a ghost town. He also challenged some of Trump's decision making. A big No No!

SoloD's avatar

Through persistent messaging from television and establishment media, the word “eugenics” has come to evoke only images of mass murder, infanticide, and other reprehensible acts. Those who use the term in this inverted sense—whether unknowingly or with deliberate intent—align themselves with what they claim to oppose.

As defined The Dictionary of the English Language:

a. Eugenics is the practice, advocacy and study of how to arrange reproduction within a human population to increase the occurrence of heritable characteristics regarded as desirable. The purpose is to improve the human species by selectively mating people with specific desirable hereditary traits. It aims to reduce human suffering by “breeding out” disease, disabilities and so-called undesirable characteristics from the human population.

b. Early supporters of eugenics believed people inherited mental illness, criminal tendencies and even poverty, and that these conditions could be bred out of the gene pool. It was a social and political philosophy, based loosely on Charles Darwin’s evolutionary theory and Francis Galton’s research on hereditary genius. It seeks to eradicate genetic defects and improve the genetic makeup of populations through selective human breeding.

c. Eugenics is directed toward promoting reproduction by individuals with ostensibly superior traits.

d. Eugenics is: Intelligent Selection and it alone offers man an opportunity never given to any other species— a chance to transcend the limitations and cruelties of the natural selection which shaped his destiny for so long.

e. Intelligent selection is the means whereby the more intelligent people will bring more of their kind into the world. Instead of killing off the unfit at an early age, as primitive natural selection did, it would simply slow the rate at which the unintelligent breed, while encouraging the intelligent to breed at a higher rate. This is an elementary procedure in the science of husbandry, yet when humans seek to apply it to themselves, they are confronted by a mass of altruistic emotions and attitudes inherited from our distant past. Only lack of understanding or downright inertia prevents man from benefiting from his own greatest discovery.

f. Eugenics has nothing to do with murdering anyone.

Negative Eugenics

It is not that childbearing should be off limits to unintelligent people. This would only be justified in such extreme cases as persistent criminality and incurable and uncontrollable hereditary diseases. It is simply that the reproduction of the less useful members of society should not be encouraged and subsidized. More important, they should not be prevented from obtaining information about contraception. We should be as charitable to the unfortunate as our circumstances permit, but we should not assist those with hereditary mental deficiencies to incapacitate their descendants. If we continue to do so, Homo sapiens will become increasingly less sapient. Simple devices and precautions which enable those with transmittable defects to control their reproduction are now widely available. We must see that the unfortunate ones know about and are encouraged to use contraceptive techniques. Negative eugenics is directed toward preventing reproduction by individuals with traits that are considered to be undesirable.

Eugenics is noble and kind and seeks only to improve the human race by adding in more genes for beauty, health and intelligence.

Negative eugenics by sterilization seeks only to reduce the number of criminals, malformed and retarded creatures that plague our beautiful earth.

As far as the intelligent people of the earth are concerned “eugenics” is a word that describes a concept that means – “good genes from good parents”, as per its definition in the dictionary of the English language.

To those seeking to improve the world: use the dictionary definition of words so that your message is understood by those you seek to influence.

User's avatar
Comment deleted
Sep 1
Comment deleted
Thomas A Braun RPh's avatar

Check into the nutrient called NAC.