Jan 23Liked by 2nd Smartest Guy in the World

PsyOp Change

The one constant in their Dystopia.

Expand full comment
Jan 23Liked by 2nd Smartest Guy in the World

When one ignores all those that don't agree, not to hard to get to 97% it would seem.

And ... they are likely lying in more ways than that.

Expand full comment

Yes: be sure to read the other post referenced at the end of your article. Doomburg.substack and alexepstein.substack are excellent also. Not only is the atmospheric CO2 the lowest in 175 million years, but global temperatures follow rather than lead atmospheric co2. The big point is that this story, like a dozen others we are being fed, is a gaslight lie. --Robertyoho.substack.com.

Expand full comment

I recall when living in Oxford, being in a bar one night and I started talking to a Climate Scientist who was about to start his PhD.

I politely asked him if he thought that the "anthropogenic climate change" theory could be wrong. His reaction was that of a religious person who had just heard a blasphemy. He ran away. That told me all I needed to know.

Expand full comment

Gerbil warming-a hoax, climate change-cyclical, season changes unless you mean the man-made one. https://blaisevanne.substack.com/ Here is where you can learn much more. It used to be the cia and fbi were modifying the weather. Feel free not to believe this, it sounds pretty far fetched they used micro wave cannons, letting thunderstorms lightning and thunder, but disperse the clouds before it rained. Recipe for wildfires? Now the Air Force and Navy is doing it instead.

Expand full comment

This video is as timely as ever, well worth a watch.


Expand full comment

Actually, the "climate-change" psy-op is NOT the most dangerous part. The one that will turn EVERYONE into slaves is the CBDC.


Expand full comment

Not only was there never any 97% consensus “on human-driven climate change”, but all such assertions were either purposely or ignorantly dishonest. And, any “scientist” who actually believes such nonsense that climate change is dependent upon or measurably impacted by the exceedingly micro-minimal and puny portion of man’s activities compared to the immense power of nature’s natural cycles, could possibly benefit from some psychoanalysis sessions or just a moment of common sense.

Expand full comment

Regarding scientific 'consensus,' one could also apply the same charges against evolution. Within my traditional Catholic world I know a handful of PhDs who question the logic, methodology and conclusions of their contemporaries. Examples are: the conclusions are correct, but we just need to keep looking until we find the evidence. Or, logically such and such cannot occur, but given enough random chances over millions-billions of years, then it could've occurred, therefore it must've occurred. Here's a good documentary series that sheds light on differences between what the scientific literature can demonstrate based on the data collected versus the conclusions that are taught in B.S. biology books.


The "95% safe & effective" trope is nothing new.

Expand full comment

Ben Davidson has a YouTube channel devoted to how our climate is primarily influenced by the Sun. This video is a good starting point down the rabbit hole. https://youtu.be/9Fx11vmgcK0

Expand full comment

PLEASE expose the ongoing GEONEGINEERING NOW, it is a MUST, in order to shut these criminals up:


that's 'The Dimming' linked also from this post:


Expand full comment

The biggest question that never gets answered is how many of these actual scientists have evidence or even a plausible model showing that any human action (other than new technology) can meaningfully impact any of these trends? And without causing more harm than good?

All of the climate accords if followed perfectly (which we all know won’t happen) still result in increased human carbon emissions. Completely eliminating ALL carbon from North America and Europe would still leave more total carbon emissions than just 20 years ago.

Even when you give them every single benefit of the doubt, their proposals are still a bad deal.

Expand full comment

And BTW, our star creates a cyclical disaster every 12,000 years, and the last one was the “Gothenburg Event”, 12K years ago.


Expand full comment
Jan 23·edited Jan 24

These changes in climate are normal and good things.

They create more Oxygen for us to breath.

That is life!

What is bad is spraying the people, the animals and sealift and earth with heavy metal toxins and other chemicals. This is what the Climate people are distracting you from. How about we have an article with pictures of the daily planes ( wasting fuels and polluting ) to spray us with toxins and other heavy metals. This is admitted by the Gov and Jon Brennan ex CIA Director that apparently is still working ( with Obama ) surprise, surprise. Video " Chemtrails" on rumble.com, bitchute.com etc. Don't forget, you dumb people it is all for a " good reason ". So take it and shut up, you will have nothing and be dead, and be happy.

I realize most the people on this site have seen these ridiculous evil videos and know this scam already to hype the climate con.

However we need to focus on this emanate damage being commented purposely and NOT the FAKE distraction of the always changing of the weather!

Which brings me to the gov GeoEngineering, D..RPA, but that should be another story topic here, another day. GeoEngineering on rumble.com, bitchute.com, odysee.com etc.

Expand full comment

I know that they're lying because here in the UK we've had 25 years of the highest immigration in our history , recently at record levels, with almost all of our immigrants coming from places with lower, normally much, much lower, per capita emission levels.

You just wouldn't have that immigration policy if there really was a climate crisis.

Expand full comment
Jan 24·edited Jan 24

What I feel is the case ( I appreciate being convinced that my understanding is wrong) is pollution . The creeks and draws near where I grew up used to have potable water and now are obviously polluted. Ground water everywhere in the USA has traces of glyphosate and other ag chemicals. 80,000 + chemicals are dumped into the air water and soil every day. These are chemicals open public science has no idea how they behave.

Kinda like gene therapy injectables. No one knows what is in them and because they are proprietary they cannot be openly studied. So this big hoot called carbon is pure fraud. Done to distract us from what is really a serious problem.

About carbon. If there is an increase in CO2 it is because of the denuding of the Earth. Forest are being destroyed (Certainly here in Calif compared to my childhood). Amazon and Congo river basin forests are being clear cut as well as South East Asia and the Pacific Northwest. And big ag keeps vast tracks of land tilled not to mention the destruction of soil bacteria the the pollution of ground water. So if there is a carbon increase this is the cause. Why? Nature is green because green trees, grass, brush, tundra all (when healthy) use and freely sequester enormous amounts of carbon.

So if I got this wrong I look forward to clearing up my cloudy mind and eyes that have seen the changes to the water ways of my childhood.

Expand full comment